TLA vs. TSMY
TLA (GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF) and TSMY (YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TLA charges 1.07%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for TSMY.
Performance
TLA vs. TSMY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TLA
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TSMY
- 1D
- -5.84%
- 1M
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 39.07%
- YTD
- 39.07%
- 1Y
- 76.70%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLA vs. TSMY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF | 6.62% |
TSMY YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF | 26.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLA and TSMY is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026 | 0.48 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLA vs. TSMY — Risk / Return Rank
TLA
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TSMY
TLA vs. TSMY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF (TLA) and YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF (TSMY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TLA | TSMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.39 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.97 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 17.81 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TLA vs. TSMY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLA drawdown since its inception was -5.44%, smaller than the maximum TSMY drawdown of -31.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLA and TSMY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLA | TSMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -31.15% | +25.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.33% | -5.84% | +5.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.33% | -5.42% | +4.09% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.32% | — |
Volatility
TLA vs. TSMY - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLA | TSMY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.53% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 26.39% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.43% | 32.09% | -17.66% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.43% | 34.30% | -19.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.43% | 34.30% | -19.87% |
TLA vs. TSMY - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLA has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TSMY's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLA vs. TSMY - Dividend Comparison
TLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.10%, less than TSMY's 51.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF | 8.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TSMY YieldMax TSM Option Income Strategy ETF | 51.72% | 56.76% | 13.71% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLA and TSMY have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TSMY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TSMY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TLA.
TSMY has the higher dividend yield at 51.72%, compared with 8.10% for TLA.
They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TLA and 0.99% for TSMY.
Find the right allocation for TLA and TSMY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer