PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TLA vs. PEPS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TLA vs. PEPS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF (TLA) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


TLA

1D
-1.25%
1M
0.17%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

PEPS

1D
-3.03%
1M
1.48%
YTD
7.73%
6M
7.55%
1Y
28.72%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TLA vs. PEPS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TLA and PEPS is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026

0.59

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TLA vs. PEPS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TLA

PEPS
PEPS Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
PEPS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PEPS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
PEPS Omega Ratio Rank: 7171
Omega Ratio Rank
PEPS Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
PEPS Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TLA vs. PEPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF (TLA) and Parametric Equity Plus ETF (PEPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TLA vs. PEPS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TLAPEPSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.81

0.93

-0.12

Drawdowns

TLA vs. PEPS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TLA drawdown since its inception was -5.44%, smaller than the maximum PEPS drawdown of -21.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLA and PEPS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TLAPEPSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.44%

-21.26%

+15.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.80%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.79%

-3.15%

+1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.34%

-2.77%

+1.43%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.10%

Volatility

TLA vs. PEPS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TLAPEPSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.42%

13.43%

+0.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.42%

18.43%

-4.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.42%

18.43%

-4.01%

TLA vs. PEPS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TLA has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than PEPS's 0.10% expense ratio.


Dividends

TLA vs. PEPS - Dividend Comparison

TLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, more than PEPS's 0.91% yield.


PositionTTM20252024
PEPS
Parametric Equity Plus ETF
0.91%1.00%0.17%
TLA
GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF
6.55%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TLA and PEPS have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PEPS is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PEPS is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TLA.

TLA has the higher dividend yield at 6.55%, compared with 0.91% for PEPS.

They also come from different issuers: GraniteShares and Parametric. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TLA and 0.10% for PEPS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TLA and PEPS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer