TLA vs. NVDL
TLA (GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF) and NVDL (GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TLA is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by GraniteShares, while NVDL is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by GraniteShares. Both are actively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TLA charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.05%/yr for NVDL.
Performance
TLA vs. NVDL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
TLA
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- 0.17%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NVDL
- 1D
- -12.37%
- 1M
- -4.64%
- YTD
- 8.98%
- 6M
- 12.39%
- 1Y
- 71.27%
- 3Y*
- 105.08%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TLA vs. NVDL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF | 3.78% |
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF | 18.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between TLA and NVDL is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2026 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TLA vs. NVDL — Risk / Return Rank
TLA
NVDL
TLA vs. NVDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF (TLA) and GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF (NVDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TLA | NVDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 1.68 | -0.87 |
Drawdowns
TLA vs. NVDL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TLA drawdown since its inception was -5.44%, smaller than the maximum NVDL drawdown of -67.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TLA and NVDL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TLA | NVDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -5.44% | -67.55% | +62.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -42.23% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -67.55% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.79% | -25.68% | +23.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.34% | -16.97% | +15.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 18.48% | — |
Volatility
TLA vs. NVDL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TLA | NVDL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 26.31% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 52.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.42% | 69.26% | -54.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 90.61% | -76.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.42% | 90.61% | -76.19% |
TLA vs. NVDL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TLA has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than NVDL's 1.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
TLA vs. NVDL - Dividend Comparison
TLA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.55%, while NVDL has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
NVDL GraniteShares 2x Long NVDA Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.29% |
TLA GraniteShares Autocallable TSLA ETF | 6.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TLA and NVDL have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, NVDL is cheaper at 1.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
NVDL is cheaper with a 1.05% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for TLA.
TLA has the higher dividend yield at 6.55%, compared with 0.00% for NVDL.
TLA is categorized as Derivative Income, while NVDL is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for TLA and 1.05% for NVDL.
Find the right allocation for TLA and NVDL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer