TJUN vs. PQAP

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TJUN (FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June) and PQAP (PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April) are both Defined Outcome funds. Over the past year, TJUN returned 13.53% vs 19.07% for PQAP. A 0.59 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TJUN charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for PQAP.

Performance

TJUN vs. PQAP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TJUN achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly lower than PQAP's 10.67% return.

TJUN

• 1D: -3.88%
• 1M: -3.12%
• YTD: 1.65%
• 6M: 2.01%
• 1Y: 13.53%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PQAP

• 1D: -0.96%
• 1M: -0.66%
• YTD: 10.67%
• 6M: 10.77%
• 1Y: 19.07%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TJUN vs. PQAP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June	1.65%	11.79%
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	10.67%	8.24%

Correlation

The correlation between TJUN and PQAP is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025	0.59

The correlation between TJUN and PQAP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

TJUN vs. PQAP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TJUN

TJUN Risk / Return Rank: 62
TJUN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
TJUN Sortino Ratio Rank: 48
TJUN Omega Ratio Rank: 69
TJUN Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
TJUN Martin Ratio Rank: 76

PQAP

PQAP Risk / Return Rank: 97
PQAP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
PQAP Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
PQAP Omega Ratio Rank: 97
PQAP Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
PQAP Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TJUN vs. PQAP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) and PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TJUN	PQAP	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.63	3.86	-2.23
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.16	6.02	-3.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.37	1.92	-0.55
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.04	8.93	-5.89
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.10	54.70	-41.60

TJUN vs. PQAP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TJUN Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is lower than the PQAP Sharpe Ratio of 3.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TJUN and PQAP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TJUN vs. PQAP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TJUN drawdown since its inception was -4.47%, smaller than the maximum PQAP drawdown of -10.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TJUN and PQAP.

Drawdown Indicators

	TJUN	PQAP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.47%	-10.79%	+6.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.47%	-2.15%	-2.32%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.88%	-1.39%	-2.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.58%	-0.61%	+0.03%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.04%	0.35%	+0.69%

Volatility

TJUN vs. PQAP - Volatility Comparison

FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June (TJUN) has a higher volatility of 4.01% compared to PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April (PQAP) at 2.63%. This indicates that TJUN's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PQAP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TJUN	PQAP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.01%	2.63%	+1.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	6.42%	3.99%	+2.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.33%	4.99%	+3.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.33%	11.03%	-2.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	8.33%	11.03%	-2.70%

TJUN vs. PQAP - Expense Ratio Comparison

TJUN has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than PQAP's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

TJUN vs. PQAP - Dividend Comparison

TJUN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PQAP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%.

Position	TTM	2025
PQAP PGIM Nasdaq-100 Buffer 12 ETF - April	0.02%	0.02%
TJUN FT Vest Emerging Markets Buffer ETF - June	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TJUN and PQAP in my portfolio?

TJUN and PQAP have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TJUN or PQAP?

TJUN has higher volatility (4.01%) compared to PQAP (2.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TJUN dropped -4.47% vs PQAP's -10.79%.

Which ETF is better, TJUN or PQAP?

On 1-year performance, PQAP leads with 19.07% vs 13.53% for TJUN. On fees, PQAP is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, PQAP has been the lower-risk option at 2.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TJUN or PQAP?

Over the 1-year period, PQAP has performed better with a 19.07% return vs 13.53%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TJUN or PQAP?

PQAP is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for TJUN.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TJUN or PQAP?

PQAP has the higher dividend yield at 0.02%, compared with 0.00% for TJUN.

What is the main difference between TJUN and PQAP?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and PGIM. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for TJUN and 0.50% for PQAP.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

PQAP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.86 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.