PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TJAN vs. HELO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TJAN vs. HELO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2027 (TJAN) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TJAN achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly higher than HELO's 1.45% return.


TJAN

1D
-0.36%
1M
0.25%
YTD
2.43%
6M
2.81%
1Y
7.84%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HELO

1D
-0.80%
1M
-0.65%
YTD
1.45%
6M
1.77%
1Y
10.13%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TJAN vs. HELO - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TJAN and HELO is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025

0.83

The correlation between TJAN and HELO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.83 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TJAN vs. HELO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TJAN
TJAN Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
TJAN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TJAN Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
TJAN Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
TJAN Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
TJAN Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

HELO
HELO Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
HELO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HELO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4747
Sortino Ratio Rank
HELO Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
HELO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
HELO Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TJAN vs. HELO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2027 (TJAN) and JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TJANHELODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.59

1.32

+0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.74

1.77

+1.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.86

7.80

+12.06

TJAN vs. HELO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TJAN Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is higher than the HELO Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TJAN and HELO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TJANHELODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84

1.63

+1.21

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.59

1.58

0.00

Drawdowns

TJAN vs. HELO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TJAN drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum HELO drawdown of -10.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TJAN and HELO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TJANHELODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-4.83%

-10.89%

+6.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.10%

-5.76%

+3.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.36%

-1.12%

+0.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.44%

-1.18%

+0.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.40%

1.30%

-0.90%

Volatility

TJAN vs. HELO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2027 (TJAN) is 0.47%, while JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HELO) has a volatility of 1.02%. This indicates that TJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HELO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TJANHELODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.47%

1.02%

-0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.16%

5.06%

-2.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.79%

6.26%

-3.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.41%

7.96%

-3.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.41%

7.96%

-3.55%

TJAN vs. HELO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than HELO's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

TJAN vs. HELO - Dividend Comparison

TJAN has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HELO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.


PositionTTM202520242023
HELO
JPMorgan Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF
0.63%0.67%0.60%0.19%
TJAN
Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2027
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TJAN and HELO have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HELO has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to TJAN (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TJAN dropped -4.83% vs HELO's -10.89%.

On 1-year performance, HELO leads with 10.13% vs 7.84% for TJAN. On fees, HELO is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, TJAN has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HELO has performed better with a 10.13% return vs 7.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

HELO is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for TJAN.

HELO has the higher dividend yield at 0.63%, compared with 0.00% for TJAN.

They also come from different issuers: Innovator and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TJAN and 0.50% for HELO.

TJAN currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TJAN and HELO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer