TJAN vs. APRW
TJAN (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2027) and APRW (AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF) are both Options Trading funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TJAN returned 7.84% vs 12.20% for APRW. A 0.80 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TJAN charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for APRW.
Performance
TJAN vs. APRW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TJAN achieves a 2.43% return, which is significantly lower than APRW's 5.80% return.
TJAN
- 1D
- -0.36%
- 1M
- 0.25%
- YTD
- 2.43%
- 6M
- 2.81%
- 1Y
- 7.84%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
APRW
- 1D
- -0.54%
- 1M
- 0.31%
- YTD
- 5.80%
- 6M
- 6.46%
- 1Y
- 12.20%
- 3Y*
- 10.09%
- 5Y*
- 7.02%
- 10Y*
- —
TJAN vs. APRW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TJAN Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2027 | 2.43% | 7.40% |
APRW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF | 5.80% | 6.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between TJAN and APRW is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2025 | 0.80 |
The correlation between TJAN and APRW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TJAN vs. APRW — Risk / Return Rank
TJAN
APRW
TJAN vs. APRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2027 (TJAN) and AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TJAN | APRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.74 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.59 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.59 | 2.14 | -0.55 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.74 | 16.31 | -12.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.86 | 81.29 | -61.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TJAN | APRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.84 | 4.57 | -1.74 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.05 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.59 | 1.14 | +0.45 |
Drawdowns
TJAN vs. APRW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TJAN drawdown since its inception was -4.83%, smaller than the maximum APRW drawdown of -9.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TJAN and APRW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TJAN | APRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.83% | -9.61% | +4.78% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.10% | -0.75% | -1.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -9.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -9.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -0.54% | +0.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.44% | -1.12% | +0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.40% | 0.15% | +0.25% |
Volatility
TJAN vs. APRW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2027 (TJAN) is 0.47%, while AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF (APRW) has a volatility of 0.77%. This indicates that TJAN experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than APRW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TJAN | APRW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.47% | 0.77% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.16% | 1.94% | +0.22% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79% | 2.68% | +0.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.41% | 6.72% | -2.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.41% | 6.41% | -2.00% |
TJAN vs. APRW - Expense Ratio Comparison
TJAN has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than APRW's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
TJAN vs. APRW - Dividend Comparison
Neither TJAN nor APRW has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
APRW AllianzIM U.S. Large Cap Buffer20 Apr ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 3.67% |
TJAN Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 2 Yr To January 2027 | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TJAN and APRW have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
APRW has higher volatility (0.77%) compared to TJAN (0.47%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TJAN dropped -4.83% vs APRW's -9.61%.
On 1-year performance, APRW leads with 12.20% vs 7.84% for TJAN. On fees, APRW is cheaper at 0.74% per year. On volatility, TJAN has been the lower-risk option at 0.47%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, APRW has performed better with a 12.20% return vs 7.84%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
APRW is cheaper with a 0.74% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for TJAN.
TJAN and APRW have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for TJAN and 0.74% for APRW.
APRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.57 vs 2.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TJAN and APRW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer