TISPX vs. PAGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF S&P 500 Index Fund (TISPX) and Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio (PAGRX).
TISPX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Oct 1, 2002. PAGRX is managed by Permanent Portfolio. It was launched on Jan 2, 1990.
Performance
TISPX vs. PAGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TISPX vs. PAGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TISPX TIAA-CREF S&P 500 Index Fund | -4.34% | 17.79% | 24.94% | 26.22% | -18.13% | 28.66% | 18.34% | 31.44% | -4.52% | 19.58% |
PAGRX Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio | -0.28% | 36.92% | 44.52% | 38.73% | -26.06% | 24.84% | 37.65% | 40.34% | -12.41% | 21.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TISPX achieves a -4.34% return, which is significantly lower than PAGRX's -0.28% return. Over the past 10 years, TISPX has underperformed PAGRX with an annualized return of 13.81%, while PAGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.12% annualized return.
TISPX
- 1D
- 2.93%
- 1M
- -5.02%
- YTD
- -4.34%
- 6M
- -2.19%
- 1Y
- 17.27%
- 3Y*
- 18.25%
- 5Y*
- 11.75%
- 10Y*
- 13.81%
PAGRX
- 1D
- 3.71%
- 1M
- -5.53%
- YTD
- -0.28%
- 6M
- 4.30%
- 1Y
- 43.96%
- 3Y*
- 35.66%
- 5Y*
- 17.52%
- 10Y*
- 19.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TISPX vs. PAGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TISPX has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than PAGRX's 1.21% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TISPX vs. PAGRX — Risk / Return Rank
TISPX
PAGRX
TISPX vs. PAGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF S&P 500 Index Fund (TISPX) and Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio (PAGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TISPX | PAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.98 | 1.74 | -0.77 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.49 | 2.49 | -0.99 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.37 | -0.14 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.32 | 3.21 | -1.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.36 | 16.28 | -9.92 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TISPX | PAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.98 | 1.74 | -0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 | 0.72 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.77 | 0.78 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.53 | +0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between TISPX and PAGRX is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TISPX vs. PAGRX - Dividend Comparison
TISPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.46%, more than PAGRX's 0.03% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TISPX TIAA-CREF S&P 500 Index Fund | 2.46% | 2.35% | 1.52% | 1.48% | 1.91% | 1.77% | 1.53% | 2.16% | 2.94% | 0.36% | 2.39% | 0.65% |
PAGRX Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio | 0.03% | 0.03% | 5.62% | 2.72% | 7.79% | 6.82% | 15.08% | 17.51% | 12.33% | 8.70% | 16.94% | 6.31% |
Drawdowns
TISPX vs. PAGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TISPX drawdown since its inception was -55.16%, roughly equal to the maximum PAGRX drawdown of -55.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TISPX and PAGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TISPX | PAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.16% | -55.87% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.11% | -13.80% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.48% | -36.52% | +12.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.75% | -38.01% | +4.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.23% | -5.77% | -0.46% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.76% | -10.09% | +3.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.52% | 2.73% | -0.21% |
Volatility
TISPX vs. PAGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TIAA-CREF S&P 500 Index Fund (TISPX) is 5.34%, while Permanent Portfolio Aggressive Growth Portfolio (PAGRX) has a volatility of 6.77%. This indicates that TISPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PAGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TISPX | PAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.34% | 6.77% | -1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.53% | 13.91% | -4.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.33% | 25.69% | -7.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.90% | 24.53% | -7.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.05% | 24.49% | -6.44% |