PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TISIX vs. BATAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TISIX vs. BATAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TIAA-CREF Short Term Bond Fund (TISIX) and BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TISIX achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than BATAX's 1.87% return. Over the past 10 years, TISIX has underperformed BATAX with an annualized return of 2.49%, while BATAX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.59% annualized return.


TISIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.27%
YTD
0.90%
6M
1.27%
1Y
4.32%
3Y*
4.88%
5Y*
2.54%
10Y*
2.49%

BATAX

1D
-0.10%
1M
0.34%
YTD
1.87%
6M
2.32%
1Y
6.24%
3Y*
6.70%
5Y*
3.41%
10Y*
3.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TISIX vs. BATAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TISIX
TIAA-CREF Short Term Bond Fund
0.90%5.91%4.59%5.07%-3.32%0.18%3.76%4.43%1.25%1.88%
BATAX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio
1.87%7.37%7.34%6.43%-5.87%1.72%2.75%6.76%2.20%5.21%

Correlation

The correlation between TISIX and BATAX is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.71

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.72

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.75

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.65

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.63

The correlation between TISIX and BATAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (all time) to 0.75 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TISIX vs. BATAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TISIX
TISIX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
TISIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TISIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
TISIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
TISIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
TISIX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

BATAX
BATAX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
BATAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BATAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BATAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
BATAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
BATAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TISIX vs. BATAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Short Term Bond Fund (TISIX) and BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TISIXBATAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.72

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.62

2.14

-0.52

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.71

6.69

-2.98

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.27

27.99

-12.72

TISIX vs. BATAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TISIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.35, which is comparable to the BATAX Sharpe Ratio of 3.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TISIX and BATAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TISIXBATAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.35

3.06

-0.72

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.25

1.57

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.40

1.17

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.45

1.11

+0.34

Drawdowns

TISIX vs. BATAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TISIX drawdown since its inception was -5.31%, smaller than the maximum BATAX drawdown of -17.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TISIX and BATAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TISIXBATAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.31%

-17.42%

+12.11%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.17%

-0.94%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.17%

-1.15%

-0.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.31%

-8.12%

+2.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-5.31%

-17.42%

+12.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-0.10%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.50%

-1.30%

+0.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.28%

0.22%

+0.06%

Volatility

TISIX vs. BATAX - Volatility Comparison

TIAA-CREF Short Term Bond Fund (TISIX) and BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio (BATAX) have volatilities of 0.65% and 0.67%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TISIXBATAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.65%

0.67%

-0.02%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.42%

1.43%

-0.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.86%

2.04%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.04%

2.18%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.78%

3.07%

-1.29%

TISIX vs. BATAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TISIX has a 0.26% expense ratio, which is higher than BATAX's 0.00% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TISIX vs. BATAX - Dividend Comparison

TISIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.34%, less than BATAX's 5.74% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BATAX
BlackRock Allocation Target Shares Series A Portfolio
5.74%5.92%5.45%3.91%3.14%1.82%3.22%4.73%5.36%4.10%0.40%0.00%
TISIX
TIAA-CREF Short Term Bond Fund
4.34%4.34%3.57%3.18%2.10%1.63%2.14%2.87%2.21%1.87%1.86%1.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


TISIX and BATAX have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BATAX has higher volatility (0.67%) compared to TISIX (0.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TISIX dropped -5.31% vs BATAX's -17.42%.

BATAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 2.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TISIX and BATAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer