TISCX vs. FLVCX
TISCX (TIAA-CREF Social Choice Equity Fund) and FLVCX (Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TISCX returned 14.72%/yr vs 16.53%/yr for FLVCX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TISCX charges 0.17%/yr vs 0.74%/yr for FLVCX.
Performance
TISCX vs. FLVCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TISCX achieves a 12.90% return, which is significantly lower than FLVCX's 26.99% return. Over the past 10 years, TISCX has underperformed FLVCX with an annualized return of 14.72%, while FLVCX has yielded a comparatively higher 16.53% annualized return.
TISCX
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 1.55%
- YTD
- 12.90%
- 6M
- 11.76%
- 1Y
- 25.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.22%
- 5Y*
- 11.66%
- 10Y*
- 14.72%
FLVCX
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- 9.26%
- YTD
- 26.99%
- 6M
- 25.31%
- 1Y
- 44.76%
- 3Y*
- 29.79%
- 5Y*
- 15.32%
- 10Y*
- 16.53%
TISCX vs. FLVCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TISCX TIAA-CREF Social Choice Equity Fund | 12.90% | 16.51% | 18.23% | 22.53% | -17.80% | 26.54% | 20.34% | 31.55% | -5.74% | 19.01% |
FLVCX Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund | 26.99% | 20.34% | 26.95% | 26.10% | -22.99% | 26.08% | 26.74% | 35.60% | -16.43% | 20.92% |
Correlation
The correlation between TISCX and FLVCX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 19, 2000 | 0.88 |
The correlation between TISCX and FLVCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TISCX vs. FLVCX — Risk / Return Rank
TISCX
FLVCX
TISCX vs. FLVCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Social Choice Equity Fund (TISCX) and Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TISCX | FLVCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.09 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.35 | 1.36 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 3.56 | -0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.44 | 12.93 | -0.49 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TISCX vs. FLVCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TISCX drawdown since its inception was -54.65%, smaller than the maximum FLVCX drawdown of -70.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TISCX and FLVCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TISCX | FLVCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -54.65% | -70.02% | +15.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.76% | -13.06% | +4.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.29% | -28.54% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.29% | -28.54% | +0.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.89% | -44.14% | +9.25% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.71% | 0.00% | -0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.08% | -10.98% | +0.90% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.12% | 3.59% | -1.47% |
Volatility
TISCX vs. FLVCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TIAA-CREF Social Choice Equity Fund (TISCX) is 4.59%, while Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund (FLVCX) has a volatility of 9.08%. This indicates that TISCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLVCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TISCX | FLVCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.59% | 9.08% | -4.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.57% | 18.05% | -7.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.27% | 22.29% | -9.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.39% | 23.07% | -3.68% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.42% | 23.51% | -4.09% |
TISCX vs. FLVCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TISCX has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than FLVCX's 0.74% expense ratio.
Dividends
TISCX vs. FLVCX - Dividend Comparison
TISCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.86%, more than FLVCX's 3.72% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLVCX Fidelity Leveraged Company Stock Fund | 3.72% | 4.72% | 14.53% | 12.19% | 18.49% | 8.40% | 0.11% | 0.10% | 19.91% | 18.96% | 27.48% | 6.18% |
TISCX TIAA-CREF Social Choice Equity Fund | 6.86% | 7.75% | 16.74% | 5.64% | 4.99% | 9.46% | 1.38% | 4.84% | 9.85% | 2.38% | 6.84% | 3.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TISCX and FLVCX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLVCX has higher volatility (9.08%) compared to TISCX (4.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TISCX dropped -54.65% vs FLVCX's -70.02%.
FLVCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TISCX and FLVCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer