PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIPZ vs. BESF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIPZ vs. BESF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF (TIPZ) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIPZ achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly lower than BESF's 16.12% return.


TIPZ

1D
-0.01%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
1.90%
6M
0.95%
1Y
3.58%
3Y*
3.45%
5Y*
0.62%
10Y*
2.37%

BESF

1D
1.01%
1M
-6.28%
YTD
16.12%
6M
15.17%
1Y
61.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIPZ vs. BESF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TIPZ
PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF
1.90%2.48%
BESF
Bastion Energy ETF
16.12%38.76%

Correlation

The correlation between TIPZ and BESF is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025

-0.17

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIPZ vs. BESF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIPZ
TIPZ Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
TIPZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIPZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIPZ Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
TIPZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIPZ Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

BESF
BESF Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
BESF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BESF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
BESF Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
BESF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
BESF Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIPZ vs. BESF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF (TIPZ) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIPZBESFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.59

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.41

-0.24

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

5.64

-3.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.08

15.57

-10.50

TIPZ vs. BESF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIPZ Sharpe Ratio is 0.92, which is lower than the BESF Sharpe Ratio of 2.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIPZ and BESF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIPZ vs. BESF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIPZ drawdown since its inception was -15.77%, which is greater than BESF's maximum drawdown of -10.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPZ and BESF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIPZBESFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.77%

-10.97%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.18%

-10.97%

+8.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.74%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.09%

-8.73%

+6.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.32%

-2.74%

-1.58%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.71%

3.97%

-3.26%

Volatility

TIPZ vs. BESF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF (TIPZ) is 1.19%, while Bastion Energy ETF (BESF) has a volatility of 6.97%. This indicates that TIPZ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BESF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIPZBESFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.19%

6.97%

-5.78%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.00%

14.93%

-11.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.90%

24.75%

-20.85%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.35%

24.39%

-18.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.85%

24.39%

-18.54%

TIPZ vs. BESF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIPZ has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than BESF's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

TIPZ vs. BESF - Dividend Comparison

TIPZ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.14%, less than BESF's 5.86% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BESF
Bastion Energy ETF
5.86%6.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TIPZ
PIMCO Broad US TIPS Index ETF
5.14%4.74%4.44%4.69%7.14%4.41%1.47%1.65%2.23%1.70%1.06%0.56%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIPZ and BESF have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BESF has higher volatility (6.97%) compared to TIPZ (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIPZ dropped -15.77% vs BESF's -10.97%.

On 1-year performance, BESF leads with 61.61% vs 3.58% for TIPZ. On fees, TIPZ is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, TIPZ has been the lower-risk option at 1.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BESF has performed better with a 61.61% return vs 3.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TIPZ is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BESF.

BESF has the higher dividend yield at 5.86%, compared with 5.14% for TIPZ.

TIPZ is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while BESF is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: PIMCO and Bastion. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for TIPZ and 0.80% for BESF.

BESF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.52 vs 0.92), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIPZ and BESF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer