PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIPX vs. BESF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIPX vs. BESF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SPDR Bloomberg Barclays 1-10 Year TIPS ETF (TIPX) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIPX achieves a 1.02% return, which is significantly lower than BESF's 13.94% return.


TIPX

1D
0.21%
1M
-0.10%
YTD
1.02%
6M
1.02%
1Y
3.61%
3Y*
4.58%
5Y*
2.18%
10Y*
2.83%

BESF

1D
-1.87%
1M
-8.03%
YTD
13.94%
6M
13.42%
1Y
55.80%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIPX vs. BESF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TIPX
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays 1-10 Year TIPS ETF
1.02%3.27%
BESF
Bastion Energy ETF
13.94%38.76%

Correlation

The correlation between TIPX and BESF is -0.16, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.16

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 4, 2025

-0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIPX vs. BESF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIPX
TIPX Risk / Return Rank: 5050
Overall Rank
TIPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4343
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIPX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
TIPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIPX Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

BESF
BESF Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BESF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BESF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
BESF Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
BESF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BESF Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIPX vs. BESF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays 1-10 Year TIPS ETF (TIPX) and Bastion Energy ETF (BESF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIPXBESFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.92

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.37

-0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.81

5.11

-2.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.64

13.92

-5.27

TIPX vs. BESF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.36, which is lower than the BESF Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIPX and BESF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIPX vs. BESF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIPX drawdown since its inception was -10.06%, smaller than the maximum BESF drawdown of -10.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPX and BESF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIPXBESFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.06%

-10.97%

+0.91%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.29%

-10.97%

+9.68%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-2.45%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-10.06%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.98%

-10.44%

+9.46%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.28%

-2.77%

+0.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.42%

4.02%

-3.60%

Volatility

TIPX vs. BESF - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SPDR Bloomberg Barclays 1-10 Year TIPS ETF (TIPX) is 1.04%, while Bastion Energy ETF (BESF) has a volatility of 7.11%. This indicates that TIPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BESF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIPXBESFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.04%

7.11%

-6.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.95%

15.05%

-13.10%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67%

24.70%

-22.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.63%

24.43%

-19.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.37%

24.43%

-20.06%

TIPX vs. BESF - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIPX has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BESF's 0.80% expense ratio.


Dividends

TIPX vs. BESF - Dividend Comparison

TIPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.57%, less than BESF's 5.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BESF
Bastion Energy ETF
5.97%6.39%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TIPX
SPDR Bloomberg Barclays 1-10 Year TIPS ETF
4.57%3.78%3.57%3.57%6.08%4.26%1.73%2.53%1.90%2.84%1.04%0.06%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIPX and BESF have a correlation of -0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BESF has higher volatility (7.11%) compared to TIPX (1.04%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIPX dropped -10.06% vs BESF's -10.97%.

On 1-year performance, BESF leads with 55.80% vs 3.61% for TIPX. On fees, TIPX is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, TIPX has been the lower-risk option at 1.04%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BESF has performed better with a 55.80% return vs 3.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TIPX is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BESF.

BESF has the higher dividend yield at 5.97%, compared with 4.57% for TIPX.

TIPX is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while BESF is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Bastion. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TIPX and 0.80% for BESF.

BESF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIPX and BESF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer