TIPG.L vs. XG7U.L
TIPG.L (Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) and XG7U.L (Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged) are both Inflation-Protected Bonds funds - TIPG.L tracks the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD while XG7U.L tracks the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR Hdg USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TIPG.L returned 1.22%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for XG7U.L. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TIPG.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for XG7U.L.
Performance
TIPG.L vs. XG7U.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TIPG.L is traded in GBp, while XG7U.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the XG7U.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIPG.L achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly lower than XG7U.L's 1.94% return.
TIPG.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- -0.45%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 0.24%
- 5Y*
- 1.22%
- 10Y*
- —
XG7U.L
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 1.10%
- YTD
- 1.94%
- 6M
- 0.75%
- 1Y
- 5.31%
- 3Y*
- 0.32%
- 5Y*
- 0.29%
- 10Y*
- 2.85%
TIPG.L vs. XG7U.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIPG.L Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 1.46% | -1.51% | 2.83% | -2.90% | -2.52% | 6.54% | 6.58% | 4.69% | 2.93% | -6.27% |
XG7U.L Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged | 1.94% | -2.79% | 1.29% | -1.07% | -7.22% | 6.31% | 6.09% | 4.19% | 5.83% | -5.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIPG.L and XG7U.L is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.76 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2016 | 0.67 |
The correlation between TIPG.L and XG7U.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.66 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIPG.L vs. XG7U.L — Risk / Return Rank
TIPG.L
XG7U.L
TIPG.L vs. XG7U.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (TIPG.L) and Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged (XG7U.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TIPG.L | XG7U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.01 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.13 | 0.00 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 0.89 | -0.14 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.67 | 2.23 | -0.56 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TIPG.L | XG7U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 0.72 | +0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.03 | +0.11 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.25 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.28 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
TIPG.L vs. XG7U.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIPG.L drawdown since its inception was -15.73%, smaller than the maximum XG7U.L drawdown of -17.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPG.L and XG7U.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIPG.L | XG7U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.73% | -17.03% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.27% | -5.94% | -0.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.00% | -9.63% | +1.63% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.73% | -17.03% | +1.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -17.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.38% | -11.62% | +1.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.90% | -8.00% | +0.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 2.38% | +0.44% |
Volatility
TIPG.L vs. XG7U.L - Volatility Comparison
Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (TIPG.L) and Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged (XG7U.L) have volatilities of 1.82% and 1.83%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIPG.L | XG7U.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.82% | 1.83% | -0.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.67% | 5.47% | -0.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.38% | 7.39% | -1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.73% | 10.30% | -1.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.30% | 11.33% | -1.03% |
TIPG.L vs. XG7U.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIPG.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than XG7U.L's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TIPG.L vs. XG7U.L - Dividend Comparison
TIPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while XG7U.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIPG.L Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
XG7U.L Xtrackers Global Inflation-Linked Bond UCITS ETF 2C USD hedged | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIPG.L and XG7U.L have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TIPG.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TIPG.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for XG7U.L.
TIPG.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while XG7U.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked TR Hdg USD. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for TIPG.L and 0.25% for XG7U.L.
Find the right allocation for TIPG.L and XG7U.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer