PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIPG.L vs. SP5L.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIPG.L vs. SP5L.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (TIPG.L) and Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TIPG.L is traded in GBp, while SP5L.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the SP5L.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIPG.L achieves a 1.61% return, which is significantly lower than SP5L.L's 10.78% return.


TIPG.L

1D
0.05%
1M
0.22%
6M
2.30%
YTD
1.61%
1Y
5.76%
3Y*
2.75%
5Y*
1.19%
10Y*

SP5L.L

1D
0.40%
1M
0.79%
6M
10.90%
YTD
10.78%
1Y
24.71%
3Y*
19.19%
5Y*
13.81%
10Y*
13.08%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIPG.L vs. SP5L.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TIPG.L
Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
1.61%-0.42%3.73%-2.20%-2.41%7.73%7.24%5.48%4.26%-6.01%
SP5L.L
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc
10.78%9.50%27.60%19.99%-8.84%31.19%13.92%26.93%1.00%-5.12%

Correlation

The correlation between TIPG.L and SP5L.L is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2016

0.16

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIPG.L vs. SP5L.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIPG.L
TIPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
TIPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
TIPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2525
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

SP5L.L
SP5L.L Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SP5L.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SP5L.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
SP5L.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
SP5L.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
SP5L.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIPG.L vs. SP5L.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (TIPG.L) and Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIPG.LSP5L.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.41

-0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.10

3.42

-2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.65

12.05

-9.41

TIPG.L vs. SP5L.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIPG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is lower than the SP5L.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIPG.L and SP5L.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIPG.L vs. SP5L.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIPG.L drawdown since its inception was -30.41%, which is greater than SP5L.L's maximum drawdown of -25.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPG.L and SP5L.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIPG.LSP5L.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.41%

-25.47%

-4.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.24%

-7.20%

+1.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.00%

-21.12%

+13.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.73%

-21.12%

+5.39%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.81%

-0.42%

-7.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.10%

-5.15%

-8.95%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.17%

2.05%

+0.12%

Volatility

TIPG.L vs. SP5L.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (TIPG.L) is 1.56%, while Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc (SP5L.L) has a volatility of 4.02%. This indicates that TIPG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SP5L.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIPG.LSP5L.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.56%

4.02%

-2.46%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.45%

7.87%

-3.42%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.20%

11.01%

-4.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.66%

18.80%

-10.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.05%

17.97%

-5.92%

TIPG.L vs. SP5L.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIPG.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than SP5L.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TIPG.L vs. SP5L.L - Dividend Comparison

TIPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, while SP5L.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
SP5L.L
Lyxor S&P 500 UCITS ETF - Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TIPG.L
Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist
1.10%1.12%0.88%0.72%0.70%0.55%0.65%0.78%0.77%0.82%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIPG.L and SP5L.L have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SP5L.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SP5L.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for TIPG.L.

TIPG.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while SP5L.L is S&P 500. TIPG.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while SP5L.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for TIPG.L and 0.07% for SP5L.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIPG.L and SP5L.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer