TIPG.L vs. PACW.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TIPG.L (Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) and PACW.L (Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income) are both exchange-traded funds - TIPG.L is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while PACW.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, TIPG.L returned 4.71% vs 30.29% for PACW.L. At a 0.06 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TIPG.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.07%/yr for PACW.L.

Performance

TIPG.L vs. PACW.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (TIPG.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

TIPG.L is traded in GBp, while PACW.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the PACW.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIPG.L achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly lower than PACW.L's 11.92% return.

TIPG.L

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 1.05%
• YTD: 1.46%
• 6M: -0.45%
• 1Y: 4.71%
• 3Y*: 0.24%
• 5Y*: 1.22%
• 10Y*: —

PACW.L

• 1D: -0.04%
• 1M: 5.24%
• YTD: 11.92%
• 6M: 12.31%
• 1Y: 30.29%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIPG.L vs. PACW.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TIPG.L Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	1.46%	-2.37%
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income	11.92%	9.58%

Correlation

The correlation between TIPG.L and PACW.L is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2025	0.06

Return for Risk

TIPG.L vs. PACW.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIPG.L

TIPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 20
TIPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
TIPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 21
TIPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 20
TIPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 18
TIPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 17

PACW.L

PACW.L Risk / Return Rank: 86
PACW.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 88
PACW.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
PACW.L Omega Ratio Rank: 89
PACW.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
PACW.L Martin Ratio Rank: 85

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIPG.L vs. PACW.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (TIPG.L) and Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TIPG.L	PACW.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.74	2.89	-2.15
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.08	3.95	-2.86
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.13	1.55	-0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.75	4.27	-3.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.67	17.43	-15.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TIPG.L vs. PACW.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIPG.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the PACW.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIPG.L and PACW.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TIPG.L	PACW.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.74	2.89	-2.15
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.14	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.11	1.24	-1.12

Drawdowns

TIPG.L vs. PACW.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIPG.L drawdown since its inception was -15.73%, smaller than the maximum PACW.L drawdown of -17.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPG.L and PACW.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	TIPG.L	PACW.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-15.73%	-17.68%	+1.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.27%	-7.06%	+0.79%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-8.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-15.73%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.38%	-0.46%	-9.92%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.90%	-3.02%	-4.88%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.82%	1.73%	+1.09%

Volatility

TIPG.L vs. PACW.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (TIPG.L) is 1.82%, while Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income (PACW.L) has a volatility of 2.93%. This indicates that TIPG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PACW.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TIPG.L	PACW.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.82%	2.93%	-1.11%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.67%	7.75%	-3.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.38%	10.42%	-4.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	8.73%	13.91%	-5.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	10.30%	13.91%	-3.61%

TIPG.L vs. PACW.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIPG.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is higher than PACW.L's 0.07% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TIPG.L vs. PACW.L - Dividend Comparison

TIPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, less than PACW.L's 1.23% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
PACW.L Amundi Prime All Country World UCITS ETF Income	1.23%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
TIPG.L Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TIPG.L and PACW.L in my portfolio?

TIPG.L and PACW.L have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TIPG.L or PACW.L?

On fees, PACW.L is cheaper at 0.07% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TIPG.L or PACW.L?

PACW.L is cheaper with a 0.07% expense ratio, compared with 0.09% for TIPG.L.

What is the main difference between TIPG.L and PACW.L?

TIPG.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while PACW.L is Global Equities. TIPG.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while PACW.L tracks Solactive GBS Global Markets Large & Mid Cap Index. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for TIPG.L and 0.07% for PACW.L.