TIPG.L vs. MEUD.L
TIPG.L (Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) and MEUD.L (Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - TIPG.L is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while MEUD.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the MSCI Europe NR EUR. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TIPG.L returned 1.22%/yr vs 9.89%/yr for MEUD.L. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. TIPG.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for MEUD.L.
Performance
TIPG.L vs. MEUD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIPG.L achieves a 1.46% return, which is significantly lower than MEUD.L's 6.58% return.
TIPG.L
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 1.05%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- -0.45%
- 1Y
- 4.71%
- 3Y*
- 0.24%
- 5Y*
- 1.22%
- 10Y*
- —
MEUD.L
- 1D
- 0.58%
- 1M
- 3.26%
- YTD
- 6.58%
- 6M
- 8.93%
- 1Y
- 19.54%
- 3Y*
- 14.05%
- 5Y*
- 9.89%
- 10Y*
- 10.28%
TIPG.L vs. MEUD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIPG.L Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 1.46% | -1.51% | 2.83% | -2.90% | -2.52% | 6.54% | 6.58% | 4.69% | 2.93% | -6.27% |
MEUD.L Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc | 6.58% | 26.51% | 3.65% | 13.48% | -5.04% | 17.06% | 3.85% | 20.40% | -9.59% | 15.43% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIPG.L and MEUD.L is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2016 | -0.02 |
The correlation between TIPG.L and MEUD.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to -0.02 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIPG.L vs. MEUD.L — Risk / Return Rank
TIPG.L
MEUD.L
TIPG.L vs. MEUD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (TIPG.L) and Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TIPG.L | MEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.30 | -0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 1.85 | -1.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.67 | 6.70 | -5.02 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TIPG.L | MEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.74 | 1.60 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | 0.71 | -0.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.69 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.11 | 0.60 | -0.48 |
Drawdowns
TIPG.L vs. MEUD.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIPG.L drawdown since its inception was -15.73%, smaller than the maximum MEUD.L drawdown of -28.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPG.L and MEUD.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIPG.L | MEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.73% | -28.57% | +12.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.27% | -10.53% | +4.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.00% | -12.61% | +4.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.73% | -17.09% | +1.36% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -28.57% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.38% | -1.33% | -9.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.90% | -4.16% | -3.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.82% | 2.91% | -0.09% |
Volatility
TIPG.L vs. MEUD.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (TIPG.L) is 1.82%, while Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc (MEUD.L) has a volatility of 4.14%. This indicates that TIPG.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MEUD.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIPG.L | MEUD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.82% | 4.14% | -2.32% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.67% | 10.20% | -5.53% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.38% | 12.14% | -5.76% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.73% | 13.94% | -5.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.30% | 14.92% | -4.62% |
TIPG.L vs. MEUD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIPG.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than MEUD.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TIPG.L vs. MEUD.L - Dividend Comparison
TIPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.01%, while MEUD.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MEUD.L Lyxor Core STOXX Europe 600 (DR) - UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TIPG.L Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% | 0.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TIPG.L and MEUD.L have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TIPG.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TIPG.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for MEUD.L.
TIPG.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while MEUD.L is Europe Equities. TIPG.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while MEUD.L tracks MSCI Europe NR EUR. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for TIPG.L and 0.15% for MEUD.L.
Find the right allocation for TIPG.L and MEUD.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer