TIPA.L vs. QDVF.DE
TIPA.L (Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc) and QDVF.DE (iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc)) are both exchange-traded funds - TIPA.L is a Inflation-Protected Bonds fund tracking the Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while QDVF.DE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, TIPA.L returned 0.58%/yr vs 19.17%/yr for QDVF.DE. At a correlation of -0.02, they often move in opposite directions. TIPA.L charges 0.09%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for QDVF.DE.
Performance
TIPA.L vs. QDVF.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
TIPA.L is traded in USD, while QDVF.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the QDVF.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TIPA.L achieves a 0.90% return, which is significantly lower than QDVF.DE's 19.85% return.
TIPA.L
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -0.08%
- 6M
- 1.16%
- YTD
- 0.90%
- 1Y
- 3.52%
- 3Y*
- 4.14%
- 5Y*
- 0.58%
- 10Y*
- —
QDVF.DE
- 1D
- 0.94%
- 1M
- -7.86%
- 6M
- 13.70%
- YTD
- 19.85%
- 1Y
- 26.61%
- 3Y*
- 12.69%
- 5Y*
- 19.17%
- 10Y*
- 8.15%
TIPA.L vs. QDVF.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIPA.L Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc | 0.90% | 6.82% | 2.10% | 3.51% | -12.83% | 6.36% | 11.05% | 0.36% |
QDVF.DE iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) | 19.85% | 9.86% | 2.96% | -0.68% | 62.85% | 54.78% | -34.53% | 1.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between TIPA.L and QDVF.DE is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.03 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.00 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2019 | -0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TIPA.L vs. QDVF.DE — Risk / Return Rank
TIPA.L
QDVF.DE
TIPA.L vs. QDVF.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (TIPA.L) and iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TIPA.L | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.05 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.20 | -0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.88 | 1.61 | +0.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.17 | 4.27 | +0.90 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TIPA.L vs. QDVF.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIPA.L drawdown since its inception was -15.13%, smaller than the maximum QDVF.DE drawdown of -67.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPA.L and QDVF.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIPA.L | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -15.13% | -67.03% | +51.90% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.86% | -16.46% | +14.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.63% | -21.88% | +17.25% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -15.13% | -28.23% | +13.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -67.03% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.09% | -15.67% | +14.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.26% | -14.36% | +9.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.68% | 6.22% | -5.54% |
Volatility
TIPA.L vs. QDVF.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (TIPA.L) is 0.92%, while iShares S&P 500 Energy Sector UCITS ETF (Acc) (QDVF.DE) has a volatility of 6.51%. This indicates that TIPA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QDVF.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TIPA.L | QDVF.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.92% | 6.51% | -5.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.44% | 20.19% | -17.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.47% | 23.67% | -20.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.94% | 27.04% | -21.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.23% | 29.67% | -23.44% |
TIPA.L vs. QDVF.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIPA.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than QDVF.DE's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
TIPA.L vs. QDVF.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither TIPA.L nor QDVF.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
TIPA.L and QDVF.DE have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TIPA.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TIPA.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for QDVF.DE.
TIPA.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while QDVF.DE is Energy Equities. TIPA.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while QDVF.DE tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Energy. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for TIPA.L and 0.15% for QDVF.DE.
Find the right allocation for TIPA.L and QDVF.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer