PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIPA.L vs. ITPG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIPA.L vs. ITPG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (TIPA.L) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (ITPG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TIPA.L is traded in USD, while ITPG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ITPG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIPA.L achieves a 0.73% return, which is significantly lower than ITPG.L's 0.91% return.


TIPA.L

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.47%
6M
0.86%
YTD
0.73%
1Y
3.12%
3Y*
3.61%
5Y*
0.41%
10Y*

ITPG.L

1D
-0.21%
1M
0.78%
6M
1.29%
YTD
0.91%
1Y
3.22%
3Y*
4.40%
5Y*
-0.58%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIPA.L vs. ITPG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
TIPA.L
Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
0.73%6.82%2.10%3.51%-12.83%6.36%11.05%0.36%
ITPG.L
iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
0.91%14.21%0.19%7.99%-22.98%5.21%13.42%6.53%

Correlation

The correlation between TIPA.L and ITPG.L is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.54

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.61

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2019

0.58

The correlation between TIPA.L and ITPG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIPA.L vs. ITPG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIPA.L
TIPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
TIPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
TIPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

ITPG.L
ITPG.L Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
ITPG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ITPG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2424
Sortino Ratio Rank
ITPG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
ITPG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
ITPG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIPA.L vs. ITPG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (TIPA.L) and iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (ITPG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIPA.LITPG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.52

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.73

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.07

+0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.67

0.62

+1.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.44

1.30

+3.14

TIPA.L vs. ITPG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIPA.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.90, which is higher than the ITPG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIPA.L and ITPG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIPA.L vs. ITPG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIPA.L drawdown since its inception was -15.13%, smaller than the maximum ITPG.L drawdown of -33.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIPA.L and ITPG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIPA.LITPG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.13%

-33.59%

+18.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.86%

-5.14%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.63%

-12.46%

+7.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-15.13%

-33.59%

+18.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

-5.42%

+4.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.24%

-10.62%

+5.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.70%

2.47%

-1.77%

Volatility

TIPA.L vs. ITPG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc (TIPA.L) is 0.78%, while iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (ITPG.L) has a volatility of 1.91%. This indicates that TIPA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ITPG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIPA.LITPG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.78%

1.91%

-1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.41%

5.94%

-3.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.45%

8.35%

-4.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.94%

11.77%

-5.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.21%

11.65%

-5.44%

TIPA.L vs. ITPG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIPA.L has a 0.09% expense ratio, which is lower than ITPG.L's 0.12% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TIPA.L vs. ITPG.L - Dividend Comparison

TIPA.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ITPG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
ITPG.L
iShares $ TIPS UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
4.66%4.56%4.62%1.50%1.24%1.09%2.03%2.79%1.92%
TIPA.L
Lyxor Core US TIPS (DR) UCITS ETF - Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIPA.L and ITPG.L have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TIPA.L is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TIPA.L is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for ITPG.L.

TIPA.L tracks Bloomberg Gbl Infl Linked US TIPS TR USD, while ITPG.L tracks BBG US Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index (USD). They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.09% for TIPA.L and 0.12% for ITPG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIPA.L and ITPG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer