PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TIP vs. XOM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TIP vs. XOM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIP achieves a 0.54% return, which is significantly lower than XOM's 30.91% return. Over the past 10 years, TIP has underperformed XOM with an annualized return of 2.37%, while XOM has yielded a comparatively higher 10.67% annualized return.


TIP

1D
-0.10%
1M
-0.50%
6M
0.02%
YTD
0.54%
1Y
2.51%
3Y*
3.73%
5Y*
0.16%
10Y*
2.37%
ALL TIME*
3.46%

XOM

1D
-0.97%
1M
14.06%
6M
11.41%
YTD
30.91%
1Y
43.67%
3Y*
17.24%
5Y*
26.54%
10Y*
10.67%
ALL TIME*
11.67%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$209.70M$179.93M$215.65M
$2.16B$2.15B$2.46B

TIP vs. XOM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
0.54%6.77%1.65%3.80%-12.26%5.68%10.84%8.35%-1.42%2.92%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
30.91%15.98%11.26%-6.26%87.41%57.58%-36.21%7.23%-15.09%-3.81%

Correlation

The correlation between TIP and XOM is -0.18, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.02

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2003

-0.08

The correlation between TIP and XOM shifts across timeframes, from -0.18 (1 year) to 0.03 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TIP vs. XOM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TIP
TIP Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
TIP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TIP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
TIP Omega Ratio Rank: 2727
Omega Ratio Rank
TIP Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
TIP Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

XOM
XOM Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
XOM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOM Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOM Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
XOM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOM Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TIP vs. XOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) and Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TIPXOMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.01

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.13

1.29

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

2.18

-0.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.39

5.53

-2.14

TIP vs. XOM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIP Sharpe Ratio is 0.74, which is lower than the XOM Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIP and XOM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TIP vs. XOM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIP drawdown since its inception was -14.57%, smaller than the maximum XOM drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIP and XOM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TIPXOMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.57%

-62.40%

+47.83%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.98%

-20.11%

+18.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.71%

-20.11%

+16.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.51%

-20.51%

+6.00%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.51%

-61.01%

+46.50%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.31%

-8.73%

+7.42%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.41%

-10.22%

+6.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.74%

7.95%

-7.21%

Volatility

TIP vs. XOM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares TIPS Bond ETF (TIP) is 0.73%, while Exxon Mobil Corporation (XOM) has a volatility of 7.52%. This indicates that TIP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TIPXOMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.73%

7.52%

-6.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.52%

20.71%

-18.19%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.39%

25.02%

-21.63%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.19%

26.65%

-20.46%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.72%

28.28%

-22.56%

Dividends

TIP vs. XOM - Dividend Comparison

TIP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, more than XOM's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TIP
iShares TIPS Bond ETF
4.46%3.46%2.52%2.73%6.96%4.28%1.17%1.75%2.71%2.07%1.48%0.34%
XOM
Exxon Mobil Corporation
2.62%3.32%3.57%3.68%3.22%5.70%8.44%4.92%4.74%3.66%3.30%3.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


TIP and XOM have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XOM has higher volatility (7.52%) compared to TIP (0.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TIP dropped -14.57% vs XOM's -62.40%.

XOM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 0.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TIP and XOM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer