PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TINF.TO vs. ONEQ.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TINF.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO) and CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINF.TO achieves a 15.08% return, which is significantly higher than ONEQ.TO's 12.41% return.


TINF.TO

1D
-1.00%
1M
5.16%
YTD
15.08%
6M
14.84%
1Y
19.70%
3Y*
18.50%
5Y*
13.83%
10Y*

ONEQ.TO

1D
-0.02%
1M
-0.52%
YTD
12.41%
6M
12.14%
1Y
26.29%
3Y*
21.18%
5Y*
12.91%
10Y*
12.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TINF.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TINF.TO
TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF
15.08%14.91%22.73%4.63%3.82%9.89%5.19%
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF
12.41%17.62%22.45%19.07%-10.74%21.65%20.70%

Correlation

The correlation between TINF.TO and ONEQ.TO is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2020

0.26

The correlation between TINF.TO and ONEQ.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TINF.TO vs. ONEQ.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINF.TO
TINF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
TINF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
TINF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

ONEQ.TO
ONEQ.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
ONEQ.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEQ.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEQ.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEQ.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEQ.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINF.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO) and CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TINF.TOONEQ.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.47

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.93

4.08

-0.15

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.80

18.06

-8.26

TINF.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is comparable to the ONEQ.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINF.TO and ONEQ.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TINF.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINF.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, smaller than the maximum ONEQ.TO drawdown of -34.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINF.TO and ONEQ.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TINF.TOONEQ.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.62%

-34.40%

+20.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.03%

-6.66%

+1.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.23%

-16.08%

+5.85%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.62%

-17.61%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-1.58%

+0.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.44%

-3.71%

+1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

1.50%

+0.52%

Volatility

TINF.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO) is 3.00%, while CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF (ONEQ.TO) has a volatility of 3.68%. This indicates that TINF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ONEQ.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TINF.TOONEQ.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.00%

3.68%

-0.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.95%

9.89%

-0.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.54%

11.89%

-1.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.89%

13.27%

-1.38%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.05%

13.93%

-1.88%

Dividends

TINF.TO vs. ONEQ.TO - Dividend Comparison

TINF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, more than ONEQ.TO's 1.62% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
ONEQ.TO
CI Global Core Plus Equity ETF
1.62%1.60%1.05%1.53%1.38%0.89%1.22%1.39%0.94%1.03%1.22%
TINF.TO
TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF
2.55%2.89%2.85%3.39%2.97%2.28%0.99%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TINF.TO and ONEQ.TO have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: TD and CI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TINF.TO and ONEQ.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer