TINF.TO vs. FINN.NEO
TINF.TO (TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF) and FINN.NEO (Fidelity Global Innovators ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, TINF.TO returned 18.19%/yr vs 40.06%/yr for FINN.NEO. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. TINF.TO charges 0.73%/yr vs 1.09%/yr for FINN.NEO.
Performance
TINF.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TINF.TO achieves a 13.92% return, which is significantly lower than FINN.NEO's 35.77% return.
TINF.TO
- 1D
- -0.04%
- 1M
- 0.33%
- 6M
- 10.90%
- YTD
- 13.92%
- 1Y
- 18.75%
- 3Y*
- 18.19%
- 5Y*
- 12.86%
- 10Y*
- —
FINN.NEO
- 1D
- -1.71%
- 1M
- -3.34%
- 6M
- 28.06%
- YTD
- 35.77%
- 1Y
- 49.48%
- 3Y*
- 40.06%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TINF.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
TINF.TO TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF | 13.92% | 14.91% | 22.73% | 0.59% |
FINN.NEO Fidelity Global Innovators ETF | 35.77% | 20.61% | 58.65% | 21.40% |
Correlation
The correlation between TINF.TO and FINN.NEO is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2023 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TINF.TO vs. FINN.NEO — Risk / Return Rank
TINF.TO
FINN.NEO
TINF.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO) and Fidelity Global Innovators ETF (FINN.NEO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TINF.TO | FINN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.26 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.36 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.74 | 4.16 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.13 | 12.96 | -3.83 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TINF.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TINF.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, smaller than the maximum FINN.NEO drawdown of -25.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINF.TO and FINN.NEO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TINF.TO | FINN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.62% | -25.66% | +12.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.03% | -11.94% | +6.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -10.23% | -25.66% | +15.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.62% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.90% | -6.49% | +3.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.44% | -3.98% | +1.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.06% | 3.83% | -1.77% |
Volatility
TINF.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO) is 3.04%, while Fidelity Global Innovators ETF (FINN.NEO) has a volatility of 6.48%. This indicates that TINF.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FINN.NEO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TINF.TO | FINN.NEO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.04% | 6.48% | -3.44% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.19% | 20.24% | -11.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.70% | 24.76% | -14.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.88% | 22.40% | -10.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.04% | 22.40% | -10.36% |
TINF.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Expense Ratio Comparison
TINF.TO has a 0.73% expense ratio, which is lower than FINN.NEO's 1.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
TINF.TO vs. FINN.NEO - Dividend Comparison
TINF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, while FINN.NEO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FINN.NEO Fidelity Global Innovators ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
TINF.TO TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF | 2.57% | 2.89% | 2.85% | 3.39% | 2.97% | 2.28% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TINF.TO and FINN.NEO have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TINF.TO is cheaper at 0.73% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TINF.TO is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 1.09% for FINN.NEO.
They also come from different issuers: TD and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.73% for TINF.TO and 1.09% for FINN.NEO.
Find the right allocation for TINF.TO and FINN.NEO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer