PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TINF.TO vs. CINF.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TINF.TO vs. CINF.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO) and CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TINF.TO achieves a 15.17% return, which is significantly lower than CINF.TO's 18.97% return.


TINF.TO

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.12%
6M
12.63%
YTD
15.17%
1Y
19.84%
3Y*
18.28%
5Y*
13.26%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.31%

CINF.TO

1D
0.38%
1M
1.40%
6M
15.23%
YTD
18.97%
1Y
21.92%
3Y*
16.59%
5Y*
12.79%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
12.87%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$42.51KCA$43.34KCA$49.76K
CA$828.31KCA$888.45KCA$1.07M

TINF.TO vs. CINF.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TINF.TO
TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF
15.17%14.91%22.73%4.63%3.82%9.89%5.19%
CINF.TO
CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool
18.97%12.54%16.53%5.27%5.03%13.56%7.49%

Correlation

The correlation between TINF.TO and CINF.TO is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.65

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 2, 2020

0.56

The correlation between TINF.TO and CINF.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.56 (all time) to 0.67 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

TINF.TO vs. CINF.TO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TINF.TO
CINF.TO

Utilities

43.3%
40.5%

Industrials

34.4%
31.2%

Energy

22.4%
16.7%

Financial Services

1.8%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

9.8%

Technology

-

-

Utilities

TINF.TO
43.3%
CINF.TO
40.5%

Industrials

TINF.TO
34.4%
CINF.TO
31.2%

Energy

TINF.TO
22.4%
CINF.TO
16.7%

Financial Services

TINF.TO
1.8%
CINF.TO

-

Basic Materials

TINF.TO

-

CINF.TO

-

Communication Services

TINF.TO

-

CINF.TO
1.8%

Consumer Cyclical

TINF.TO

-

CINF.TO

-

Consumer Defensive

TINF.TO

-

CINF.TO

-

Healthcare

TINF.TO

-

CINF.TO

-

Real Estate

TINF.TO

-

CINF.TO
9.8%

Technology

TINF.TO

-

CINF.TO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TINF.TO vs. CINF.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TINF.TO
TINF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
TINF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TINF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
TINF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
TINF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
TINF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

CINF.TO
CINF.TO Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
CINF.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CINF.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 9090
Sortino Ratio Rank
CINF.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 9090
Omega Ratio Rank
CINF.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CINF.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TINF.TO vs. CINF.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO) and CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TINF.TOCINF.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

1.42

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.96

4.14

-0.18

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.54

12.25

-2.70

TINF.TO vs. CINF.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TINF.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.86, which is comparable to the CINF.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TINF.TO and CINF.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TINF.TO vs. CINF.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TINF.TO drawdown since its inception was -13.62%, which is greater than CINF.TO's maximum drawdown of -12.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TINF.TO and CINF.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TINF.TOCINF.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.62%

-12.27%

-1.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.03%

-5.31%

+0.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-10.23%

-9.62%

-0.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.62%

-12.27%

-1.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

0.00%

-1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.44%

-2.04%

-0.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.08%

1.79%

+0.29%

Volatility

TINF.TO vs. CINF.TO - Volatility Comparison

TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF (TINF.TO) has a higher volatility of 2.96% compared to CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool (CINF.TO) at 1.87%. This indicates that TINF.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CINF.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TINF.TOCINF.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.96%

1.87%

+1.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.15%

7.68%

+1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.70%

9.56%

+1.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.86%

11.95%

-0.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.03%

12.05%

-0.02%

Dividends

TINF.TO vs. CINF.TO - Dividend Comparison

TINF.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than CINF.TO's 2.38% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CINF.TO
CI Global Infrastructure Private Pool
2.38%2.80%3.06%3.45%3.51%3.56%2.27%
TINF.TO
TD Active Global Infrastructure Equity ETF
2.54%2.89%2.85%3.39%2.97%2.28%0.99%

Frequently Asked Questions


TINF.TO and CINF.TO have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

They also come from different issuers: TD and CI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TINF.TO and CINF.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer