PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TILUX vs. LIFAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TILUX vs. LIFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Inflation-Linked Fixed Income Fund (TILUX) and Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A (LIFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TILUX achieves a 1.39% return, which is significantly lower than LIFAX's 1.95% return. Over the past 10 years, TILUX has underperformed LIFAX with an annualized return of 2.65%, while LIFAX has yielded a comparatively higher 3.80% annualized return.


TILUX

1D
0.00%
1M
-0.02%
YTD
1.39%
6M
1.30%
1Y
4.49%
3Y*
3.90%
5Y*
0.75%
10Y*
2.65%

LIFAX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.11%
YTD
1.95%
6M
2.16%
1Y
5.36%
3Y*
5.17%
5Y*
2.99%
10Y*
3.80%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TILUX vs. LIFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TILUX
Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Inflation-Linked Fixed Income Fund
1.39%6.41%1.86%3.34%-12.14%5.42%12.70%8.11%-2.05%3.15%
LIFAX
Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A
1.95%7.03%4.53%3.76%-5.57%10.29%5.94%4.87%-1.27%1.34%

Correlation

The correlation between TILUX and LIFAX is 0.56, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.56

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.64

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2016

0.43

The correlation between TILUX and LIFAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.43 (all time) to 0.65 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TILUX vs. LIFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TILUX
TILUX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
TILUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILUX Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
TILUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILUX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

LIFAX
LIFAX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
LIFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LIFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
LIFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
LIFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
LIFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TILUX vs. LIFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Inflation-Linked Fixed Income Fund (TILUX) and Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A (LIFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TILUXLIFAXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

2.33

-1.21

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.65

4.19

-2.54

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.50

-0.30

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.95

4.88

-2.93

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.25

20.24

-14.99

TILUX vs. LIFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILUX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the LIFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILUX and LIFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TILUXLIFAXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

2.33

-1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.13

0.75

-0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.50

0.84

-0.34

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.54

0.46

+0.08

Drawdowns

TILUX vs. LIFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILUX drawdown since its inception was -14.72%, smaller than the maximum LIFAX drawdown of -18.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILUX and LIFAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TILUXLIFAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.72%

-18.15%

+3.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.72%

-1.18%

-1.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.41%

-2.03%

-2.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.72%

-8.56%

-6.16%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.72%

-18.05%

+3.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

0.00%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.60%

-3.51%

-0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.01%

0.29%

+0.72%

Volatility

TILUX vs. LIFAX - Volatility Comparison

Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Inflation-Linked Fixed Income Fund (TILUX) has a higher volatility of 1.32% compared to Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A (LIFAX) at 0.67%. This indicates that TILUX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LIFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TILUXLIFAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.32%

0.67%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.90%

1.65%

+1.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.29%

2.28%

+2.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.02%

4.00%

+2.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.42%

4.54%

+0.88%

TILUX vs. LIFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TILUX has a 0.86% expense ratio, which is higher than LIFAX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

TILUX vs. LIFAX - Dividend Comparison

TILUX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.07%, less than LIFAX's 4.71% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
LIFAX
Lord Abbett Inflation Focused Fund Class A
4.71%4.74%4.00%3.69%2.60%2.35%3.59%3.95%3.95%3.76%4.32%4.21%
TILUX
Morgan Stanley Pathway Funds Inflation-Linked Fixed Income Fund
3.07%2.92%3.72%1.77%16.54%9.24%2.28%2.27%3.45%3.01%2.97%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TILUX and LIFAX have a correlation of 0.56, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TILUX has higher volatility (1.32%) compared to LIFAX (0.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILUX dropped -14.72% vs LIFAX's -18.15%.

LIFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TILUX and LIFAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer