PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TILCX vs. IWS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TILCX vs. IWS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund (TILCX) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TILCX having a 15.11% return and IWS slightly lower at 15.06%. Over the past 10 years, TILCX has outperformed IWS with an annualized return of 11.05%, while IWS has yielded a comparatively lower 10.23% annualized return.


TILCX

1D
0.65%
1M
4.35%
YTD
15.11%
6M
17.21%
1Y
26.91%
3Y*
16.96%
5Y*
9.24%
10Y*
11.05%

IWS

1D
-0.04%
1M
3.74%
YTD
15.06%
6M
15.13%
1Y
27.01%
3Y*
17.40%
5Y*
8.37%
10Y*
10.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TILCX vs. IWS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TILCX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund
15.11%11.82%11.32%9.64%-5.10%25.89%3.08%26.67%-9.38%16.81%
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
15.06%10.82%12.91%12.52%-12.29%28.10%4.83%26.73%-12.43%13.14%

Correlation

The correlation between TILCX and IWS is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.89

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.92

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2001

0.92

The correlation between TILCX and IWS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TILCX vs. IWS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TILCX
TILCX Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
TILCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TILCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
TILCX Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
TILCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
TILCX Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

IWS
IWS Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
IWS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IWS Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
IWS Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
IWS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
IWS Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TILCX vs. IWS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund (TILCX) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TILCXIWSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

1.36

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.92

3.60

+0.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.93

13.59

+1.34

TILCX vs. IWS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TILCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.55, which is comparable to the IWS Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TILCX and IWS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TILCXIWSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.55

2.06

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.62

0.49

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

0.53

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.46

0.42

+0.04

Drawdowns

TILCX vs. IWS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TILCX drawdown since its inception was -57.60%, smaller than the maximum IWS drawdown of -62.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TILCX and IWS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TILCXIWSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.60%

-62.40%

+4.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.00%

-7.53%

+0.53%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.55%

-20.57%

+5.02%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.95%

-21.23%

+3.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.85%

-43.83%

+3.98%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.57%

-0.04%

-0.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

-8.02%

+0.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.83%

1.99%

-0.16%

Volatility

TILCX vs. IWS - Volatility Comparison

T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund (TILCX) and iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF (IWS) have volatilities of 3.32% and 3.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TILCXIWSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

3.40%

-0.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.28%

9.57%

-1.29%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.78%

13.19%

-2.41%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.88%

17.30%

-2.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.59%

19.36%

-1.77%

TILCX vs. IWS - Expense Ratio Comparison

TILCX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than IWS's 0.23% expense ratio.


Dividends

TILCX vs. IWS - Dividend Comparison

TILCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.12%, more than IWS's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
IWS
iShares Russell Mid-Cap Value ETF
1.34%1.53%1.50%1.76%1.93%1.39%1.87%1.97%2.53%1.96%2.10%2.14%
TILCX
T. Rowe Price Large-Cap Value Fund
11.12%12.80%8.32%8.41%19.17%6.88%3.05%5.67%7.61%4.79%4.10%6.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


TILCX and IWS have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

IWS has higher volatility (3.40%) compared to TILCX (3.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TILCX dropped -57.60% vs IWS's -62.40%.

TILCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.55 vs 2.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TILCX and IWS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer