TIILX vs. FFNYX
Compare and contrast key facts about TIAA-CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Fund (TIILX) and Fidelity SAI 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FFNYX).
TIILX is managed by TIAA Investments. It was launched on Sep 30, 2002. FFNYX is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg US Treasury 0-5 Year TIPS Index. It was launched on Nov 4, 2025.
Performance
TIILX vs. FFNYX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TIILX vs. FFNYX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
TIILX TIAA-CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Fund | -0.64% |
FFNYX Fidelity SAI 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund | -0.10% |
Returns By Period
TIILX
- 1D
- 0.46%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- YTD
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 0.65%
- 1Y
- 3.64%
- 3Y*
- 4.06%
- 5Y*
- 2.54%
- 10Y*
- 2.85%
FFNYX
- 1D
- 0.30%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TIILX vs. FFNYX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TIILX has a 0.23% expense ratio, which is higher than FFNYX's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
TIILX vs. FFNYX — Risk / Return Rank
TIILX
FFNYX
TIILX vs. FFNYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TIAA-CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Fund (TIILX) and Fidelity SAI 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund (FFNYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TIILX | FFNYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.25 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.82 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.16 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.60 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TIILX | FFNYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.75 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | -1.03 | +1.73 |
Correlation
The correlation between TIILX and FFNYX is 0.99, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TIILX vs. FFNYX - Dividend Comparison
TIILX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.12%, while FFNYX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TIILX TIAA-CREF Inflation-Linked Bond Fund | 3.12% | 3.95% | 3.45% | 3.38% | 8.60% | 6.29% | 1.28% | 1.85% | 2.59% | 2.00% | 1.55% | 0.33% |
FFNYX Fidelity SAI 0-5 Year Inflation-Protected Bond Index Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
TIILX vs. FFNYX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TIILX drawdown since its inception was -14.24%, which is greater than FFNYX's maximum drawdown of -0.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIILX and FFNYX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TIILX | FFNYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.24% | -0.69% | -13.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.12% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -9.57% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -9.57% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.91% | -0.30% | -0.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.94% | -0.40% | -2.54% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.53% | — | — |
Volatility
TIILX vs. FFNYX - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TIILX | FFNYX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.02% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.75% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.18% | 2.51% | +0.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.39% | 2.51% | +1.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.83% | 2.51% | +1.32% |