TIGB.L vs. XLKQ.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TIGB.L (Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist) and XLKQ.L (Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - TIGB.L is a Short-Term Bond fund tracking the Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index, while XLKQ.L is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TIGB.L returned 4.48%/yr vs 33.18%/yr for XLKQ.L. At a correlation of -0.07, they often move in opposite directions. TIGB.L charges 0.10%/yr vs 0.14%/yr for XLKQ.L.

Performance

TIGB.L vs. XLKQ.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (TIGB.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TIGB.L achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than XLKQ.L's 23.81% return.

TIGB.L

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 1.42%
• 6M: 1.75%
• 1Y: 3.78%
• 3Y*: 4.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

XLKQ.L

• 1D: -2.23%
• 1M: 14.41%
• YTD: 23.81%
• 6M: 22.31%
• 1Y: 54.52%
• 3Y*: 33.18%
• 5Y*: 26.60%
• 10Y*: 27.22%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TIGB.L vs. XLKQ.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TIGB.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist	1.42%	4.10%	4.94%	4.27%	0.03%
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc	23.81%	15.76%	44.03%	51.84%	-11.63%

Correlation

The correlation between TIGB.L and XLKQ.L is -0.13, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.13
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.08
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 7, 2022	-0.07

Return for Risk

TIGB.L vs. XLKQ.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TIGB.L

TIGB.L Risk / Return Rank: 97
TIGB.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
TIGB.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
TIGB.L Omega Ratio Rank: 98
TIGB.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
TIGB.L Martin Ratio Rank: 98

XLKQ.L

XLKQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 73
XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
XLKQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
XLKQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 78
XLKQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
XLKQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 51

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TIGB.L vs. XLKQ.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (TIGB.L) and Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TIGB.L	XLKQ.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	3.87	2.83	+1.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	6.05	3.59	+2.46
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	2.34	1.46	+0.88
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	12.51	3.24	+9.28
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	73.64	8.42	+65.21
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TIGB.L vs. XLKQ.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TIGB.L Sharpe Ratio is 3.87, which is higher than the XLKQ.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TIGB.L and XLKQ.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TIGB.L	XLKQ.L	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.87	2.83	+1.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.21	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	1.33	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	5.48	1.33	+4.15

Drawdowns

TIGB.L vs. XLKQ.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TIGB.L drawdown since its inception was -0.50%, smaller than the maximum XLKQ.L drawdown of -28.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TIGB.L and XLKQ.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	TIGB.L	XLKQ.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.50%	-28.74%	+28.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-0.30%	-16.76%	+16.46%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-0.30%	-28.74%	+28.44%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-28.74%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-28.74%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-2.84%	+2.84%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.03%	-5.04%	+5.01%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.05%	6.45%	-6.40%

Volatility

TIGB.L vs. XLKQ.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist (TIGB.L) is 0.45%, while Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc (XLKQ.L) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that TIGB.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XLKQ.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TIGB.L	XLKQ.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.45%	6.83%	-6.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	0.71%	14.29%	-13.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.97%	19.18%	-18.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.74%	22.04%	-21.30%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.74%	21.65%	-20.91%

TIGB.L vs. XLKQ.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TIGB.L has a 0.10% expense ratio, which is lower than XLKQ.L's 0.14% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TIGB.L vs. XLKQ.L - Dividend Comparison

TIGB.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.92%, while XLKQ.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
TIGB.L Invesco US Treasury Bond 0-1 Year UCITS ETF GBP Hedged Dist	3.92%	4.11%	4.93%	4.53%	1.46%
XLKQ.L Invesco Technology S&P US Select Sector UCITS ETF GBP Acc	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TIGB.L and XLKQ.L in my portfolio?

TIGB.L and XLKQ.L have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, TIGB.L or XLKQ.L?

On fees, TIGB.L is cheaper at 0.10% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, TIGB.L or XLKQ.L?

TIGB.L is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLKQ.L.

What is the main difference between TIGB.L and XLKQ.L?

TIGB.L is categorized as Short-Term Bond, while XLKQ.L is Technology Equities. TIGB.L tracks Bloomberg US Treasury Coupons Index, while XLKQ.L tracks S&P Select Sector Capped 20% Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.10% for TIGB.L and 0.14% for XLKQ.L.