PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TI5G.L vs. IITU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TI5G.L vs. IITU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (TI5G.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TI5G.L is traded in GBP, while IITU.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IITU.L values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TI5G.L achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly lower than IITU.L's 23.25% return.


TI5G.L

1D
0.04%
1M
0.09%
YTD
2.07%
6M
1.98%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
4.91%
5Y*
2.89%
10Y*

IITU.L

1D
-2.08%
1M
14.24%
YTD
23.25%
6M
22.00%
1Y
53.38%
3Y*
30.94%
5Y*
25.50%
10Y*
27.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TI5G.L vs. IITU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TI5G.L
iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
2.07%5.70%4.60%3.62%-3.69%5.28%4.05%3.05%-0.77%
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
23.25%14.44%40.85%50.70%-20.63%35.67%38.34%44.21%-1.38%

Correlation

The correlation between TI5G.L and IITU.L is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2018

-0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TI5G.L vs. IITU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TI5G.L
TI5G.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TI5G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TI5G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
TI5G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
TI5G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TI5G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

IITU.L
IITU.L Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
IITU.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IITU.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
IITU.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7676
Omega Ratio Rank
IITU.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
IITU.L Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TI5G.L vs. IITU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (TI5G.L) and iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TI5G.LIITU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.44

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.26

3.17

+2.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.49

8.17

+9.31

TI5G.L vs. IITU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TI5G.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is lower than the IITU.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TI5G.L and IITU.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TI5G.LIITU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

2.71

-1.03

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

1.16

-0.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

1.28

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

1.23

-0.34

Drawdowns

TI5G.L vs. IITU.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TI5G.L drawdown since its inception was -5.63%, smaller than the maximum IITU.L drawdown of -28.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TI5G.L and IITU.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TI5G.LIITU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.63%

-28.03%

+22.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.83%

-16.76%

+15.93%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.55%

-28.03%

+26.48%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.63%

-28.03%

+22.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-2.89%

+2.81%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.02%

-5.14%

+4.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

6.51%

-6.26%

Volatility

TI5G.L vs. IITU.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (TI5G.L) is 0.58%, while iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (IITU.L) has a volatility of 7.01%. This indicates that TI5G.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IITU.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TI5G.LIITU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.58%

7.01%

-6.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.69%

14.45%

-12.76%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60%

19.60%

-17.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.08%

21.94%

-18.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.23%

21.31%

-18.08%

TI5G.L vs. IITU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

TI5G.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than IITU.L's 0.15% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TI5G.L vs. IITU.L - Dividend Comparison

TI5G.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, while IITU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IITU.L
iShares S&P 500 Information Technology Sector UCITS ETF USD (Acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TI5G.L
iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
5.85%5.98%6.83%5.19%0.32%0.34%3.06%3.28%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


TI5G.L and IITU.L have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TI5G.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TI5G.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for IITU.L.

TI5G.L is categorized as Inflation-Protected Bonds, while IITU.L is Technology Equities. TI5G.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5, while IITU.L tracks S&P 500 Capped 35/20 Information Technology Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for TI5G.L and 0.15% for IITU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TI5G.L and IITU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer