PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TI5G.L vs. IBCI.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TI5G.L vs. IBCI.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (TI5G.L) and iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (IBCI.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

TI5G.L is traded in GBP, while IBCI.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the IBCI.DE values have been converted to GBP using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TI5G.L achieves a 2.07% return, which is significantly lower than IBCI.DE's 2.34% return.


TI5G.L

1D
0.04%
1M
0.09%
YTD
2.07%
6M
1.98%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
4.91%
5Y*
2.89%
10Y*

IBCI.DE

1D
0.05%
1M
0.40%
YTD
2.34%
6M
1.82%
1Y
6.11%
3Y*
2.11%
5Y*
0.87%
10Y*
2.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TI5G.L vs. IBCI.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
TI5G.L
iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
2.07%5.70%4.60%3.62%-3.69%5.28%4.05%3.05%-0.77%
IBCI.DE
iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF
2.34%6.06%-4.53%3.31%-4.33%-1.30%8.64%0.78%-0.56%

Correlation

The correlation between TI5G.L and IBCI.DE is 0.10, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.32

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2018

0.25

The correlation between TI5G.L and IBCI.DE shifts across timeframes, from 0.10 (1 year) to 0.32 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TI5G.L vs. IBCI.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TI5G.L
TI5G.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TI5G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TI5G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
TI5G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
TI5G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
TI5G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank

IBCI.DE
IBCI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
IBCI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IBCI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
IBCI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
IBCI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
IBCI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TI5G.L vs. IBCI.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (TI5G.L) and iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (IBCI.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TI5G.LIBCI.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.21

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.26

1.96

+3.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.49

4.51

+12.98

TI5G.L vs. IBCI.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TI5G.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is higher than the IBCI.DE Sharpe Ratio of 1.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TI5G.L and IBCI.DE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TI5G.LIBCI.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.68

1.19

+0.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

0.11

+0.83

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.28

+0.61

Drawdowns

TI5G.L vs. IBCI.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TI5G.L drawdown since its inception was -5.63%, smaller than the maximum IBCI.DE drawdown of -13.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TI5G.L and IBCI.DE.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TI5G.LIBCI.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-5.63%

-13.17%

+7.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.83%

-3.11%

+2.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-1.55%

-6.13%

+4.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-5.63%

-12.20%

+6.57%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-13.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.08%

-1.47%

+1.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.02%

-5.24%

+4.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.25%

1.35%

-1.10%

Volatility

TI5G.L vs. IBCI.DE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist) (TI5G.L) is 0.58%, while iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF (IBCI.DE) has a volatility of 1.61%. This indicates that TI5G.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IBCI.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TI5G.LIBCI.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.58%

1.61%

-1.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.69%

3.63%

-1.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.60%

5.12%

-2.52%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

3.08%

7.68%

-4.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.23%

8.71%

-5.48%

TI5G.L vs. IBCI.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

TI5G.L has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than IBCI.DE's 0.09% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TI5G.L vs. IBCI.DE - Dividend Comparison

TI5G.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.85%, while IBCI.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
IBCI.DE
iShares € Inflation Linked Govt Bond UCITS ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TI5G.L
iShares $ TIPS 0-5 UCITS ETF GBP Hedged (Dist)
5.85%5.98%6.83%5.19%0.32%0.34%3.06%3.28%2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions


TI5G.L and IBCI.DE have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IBCI.DE is cheaper at 0.09% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IBCI.DE is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for TI5G.L.

TI5G.L tracks ICE U.S. Treasury Inflation Linked Bond Index 0-5, while IBCI.DE tracks Bloomberg Euro Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for TI5G.L and 0.09% for IBCI.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TI5G.L and IBCI.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer