THTA vs. OMAH

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

THTA (SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF) and OMAH (VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, THTA returned 16.62% vs 12.64% for OMAH. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. THTA charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for OMAH.

Performance

THTA vs. OMAH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THTA achieves a 6.88% return, which is significantly higher than OMAH's 5.30% return.

THTA

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.64%
• YTD: 6.88%
• 6M: 8.17%
• 1Y: 16.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

OMAH

• 1D: -0.32%
• 1M: 0.99%
• YTD: 5.30%
• 6M: 5.17%
• 1Y: 12.64%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THTA vs. OMAH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
THTA SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF	6.88%	-11.28%
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	5.30%	6.74%

Correlation

The correlation between THTA and OMAH is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 6, 2025	0.37

Return for Risk

THTA vs. OMAH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THTA

THTA Risk / Return Rank: 92
THTA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
THTA Sortino Ratio Rank: 90
THTA Omega Ratio Rank: 95
THTA Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
THTA Martin Ratio Rank: 97

OMAH

OMAH Risk / Return Rank: 54
OMAH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 45
OMAH Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
OMAH Omega Ratio Rank: 44
OMAH Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
OMAH Martin Ratio Rank: 59

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THTA vs. OMAH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA) and VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	THTA	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.88	1.58	+1.30
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	4.25	2.23	+2.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.74	1.28	+0.46
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	6.28	4.21	+2.08
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	51.29	10.55	+40.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

THTA vs. OMAH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THTA Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is higher than the OMAH Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THTA and OMAH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	THTA	OMAH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.88	1.58	+1.30
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.08	0.75	-0.67

Drawdowns

THTA vs. OMAH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THTA drawdown since its inception was -31.41%, which is greater than OMAH's maximum drawdown of -11.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THTA and OMAH.

Drawdown Indicators

	THTA	OMAH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.41%	-11.83%	-19.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.64%	-3.00%	+0.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.77%	-1.97%	-4.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.52%	-1.25%	-6.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.32%	1.20%	-0.88%

Volatility

THTA vs. OMAH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF (THTA) is 0.75%, while VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF (OMAH) has a volatility of 1.79%. This indicates that THTA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OMAH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	THTA	OMAH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	0.75%	1.79%	-1.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	4.00%	5.44%	-1.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5.80%	8.02%	-2.22%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.27%	13.22%	+7.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.27%	13.22%	+7.05%

THTA vs. OMAH - Expense Ratio Comparison

THTA has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than OMAH's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

THTA vs. OMAH - Dividend Comparison

THTA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.26%, less than OMAH's 15.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
OMAH VistaShares Target 15™ Berkshire Select Income ETF	15.33%	12.86%	0.00%	0.00%
THTA SoFi Enhanced Yield ETF	11.26%	12.66%	12.44%	0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both THTA and OMAH in my portfolio?

THTA and OMAH have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, THTA or OMAH?

OMAH has higher volatility (1.79%) compared to THTA (0.75%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THTA dropped -31.41% vs OMAH's -11.83%.

Which ETF is better, THTA or OMAH?

On 1-year performance, THTA leads with 16.62% vs 12.64% for OMAH. On fees, THTA is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, THTA has been the lower-risk option at 0.75%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, THTA or OMAH?

Over the 1-year period, THTA has performed better with a 16.62% return vs 12.64%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, THTA or OMAH?

THTA is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for OMAH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, THTA or OMAH?

OMAH has the higher dividend yield at 15.33%, compared with 11.26% for THTA.

What is the main difference between THTA and OMAH?

They also come from different issuers: SoFi and VistaShares. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for THTA and 0.95% for OMAH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

THTA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.88 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.