PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THPGX vs. SMVLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THPGX vs. SMVLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thompson LargeCap Fund (THPGX) and Smead Value Fund (SMVLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THPGX achieves a 10.11% return, which is significantly lower than SMVLX's 13.71% return. Over the past 10 years, THPGX has outperformed SMVLX with an annualized return of 14.74%, while SMVLX has yielded a comparatively lower 12.33% annualized return.


THPGX

1D
0.33%
1M
-0.74%
YTD
10.11%
6M
9.56%
1Y
36.08%
3Y*
20.42%
5Y*
13.07%
10Y*
14.74%

SMVLX

1D
0.25%
1M
-0.57%
YTD
13.71%
6M
12.91%
1Y
26.11%
3Y*
12.77%
5Y*
10.10%
10Y*
12.33%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THPGX vs. SMVLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
THPGX
Thompson LargeCap Fund
10.11%27.10%17.14%22.06%-15.78%28.09%15.49%33.59%-12.31%18.24%
SMVLX
Smead Value Fund
13.71%5.05%4.78%16.87%-2.79%42.46%1.71%26.29%-4.79%19.73%

Correlation

The correlation between THPGX and SMVLX is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.73

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.80

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.84

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2009

0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between THPGX and SMVLX has dropped to 0.59 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THPGX vs. SMVLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THPGX
THPGX Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
THPGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THPGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
THPGX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
THPGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
THPGX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

SMVLX
SMVLX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
SMVLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMVLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMVLX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
SMVLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMVLX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THPGX vs. SMVLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thompson LargeCap Fund (THPGX) and Smead Value Fund (SMVLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


THPGXSMVLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.97

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.33

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.42

4.54

-0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.77

13.10

+4.68

THPGX vs. SMVLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THPGX Sharpe Ratio is 2.85, which is higher than the SMVLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THPGX and SMVLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

THPGX vs. SMVLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THPGX drawdown since its inception was -65.52%, which is greater than SMVLX's maximum drawdown of -39.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THPGX and SMVLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THPGXSMVLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-65.52%

-39.56%

-25.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.16%

-5.90%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.75%

-24.62%

+5.87%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.49%

-24.62%

-1.87%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.68%

-39.56%

-1.12%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.00%

-3.23%

+1.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.57%

-4.58%

-4.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.02%

2.04%

-0.02%

Volatility

THPGX vs. SMVLX - Volatility Comparison

Thompson LargeCap Fund (THPGX) has a higher volatility of 4.03% compared to Smead Value Fund (SMVLX) at 3.53%. This indicates that THPGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMVLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THPGXSMVLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.03%

3.53%

+0.50%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.32%

8.76%

+0.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.64%

14.25%

-1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.79%

18.39%

-0.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.95%

19.48%

+0.47%

THPGX vs. SMVLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

THPGX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than SMVLX's 1.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

THPGX vs. SMVLX - Dividend Comparison

THPGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, more than SMVLX's 1.47% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SMVLX
Smead Value Fund
1.47%1.67%1.08%1.34%1.78%3.91%1.40%3.83%7.47%0.22%3.14%3.10%
THPGX
Thompson LargeCap Fund
5.09%5.60%11.97%8.38%5.06%4.95%0.90%2.73%0.89%0.82%0.80%0.72%

Frequently Asked Questions


THPGX and SMVLX have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THPGX has higher volatility (4.03%) compared to SMVLX (3.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THPGX dropped -65.52% vs SMVLX's -39.56%.

THPGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.85 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THPGX and SMVLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer