PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THEQ vs. HOLA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THEQ vs. HOLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Hedged Equity ETF (THEQ) and JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with THEQ having a 5.11% return and HOLA slightly lower at 5.02%.


THEQ

1D
-0.16%
1M
-1.22%
YTD
5.11%
6M
4.59%
1Y
14.28%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

HOLA

1D
-0.51%
1M
1.26%
YTD
5.02%
6M
3.65%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THEQ vs. HOLA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between THEQ and HOLA is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025

0.69

THEQ vs. HOLA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
THEQ
HOLA

Technology

35.6%
12.2%

Financial Services

12.2%
25.7%

Communication Services

10.8%
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
8.3%

Healthcare

9.2%
10.1%

Industrials

7.7%
18.5%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
6.6%

Energy

3.6%
3.4%

Utilities

2.9%
4.3%

Basic Materials

1.7%
5.4%

Real Estate

1.6%
1.0%

Technology

THEQ
35.6%
HOLA
12.2%

Financial Services

THEQ
12.2%
HOLA
25.7%

Communication Services

THEQ
10.8%
HOLA
4.4%

Consumer Cyclical

THEQ
9.5%
HOLA
8.3%

Healthcare

THEQ
9.2%
HOLA
10.1%

Industrials

THEQ
7.7%
HOLA
18.5%

Consumer Defensive

THEQ
5.1%
HOLA
6.6%

Energy

THEQ
3.6%
HOLA
3.4%

Utilities

THEQ
2.9%
HOLA
4.3%

Basic Materials

THEQ
1.7%
HOLA
5.4%

Real Estate

THEQ
1.6%
HOLA
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THEQ vs. HOLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THEQ
THEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
THEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5252
Sortino Ratio Rank
THEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
THEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
THEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank

HOLA

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THEQ vs. HOLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Hedged Equity ETF (THEQ) and JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


THEQHOLADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.78

THEQ vs. HOLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

THEQ vs. HOLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THEQ drawdown since its inception was -8.20%, which is greater than HOLA's maximum drawdown of -6.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THEQ and HOLA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THEQHOLADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.20%

-6.99%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.17%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.40%

-1.39%

-1.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.05%

-1.44%

+0.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.46%

Volatility

THEQ vs. HOLA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THEQHOLADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.06%

9.93%

-0.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.64%

9.93%

+1.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.64%

9.93%

+1.71%

THEQ vs. HOLA - Expense Ratio Comparison

THEQ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than HOLA's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

THEQ vs. HOLA - Dividend Comparison

THEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than HOLA's 2.88% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


THEQ and HOLA have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, THEQ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

THEQ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HOLA.

HOLA has the higher dividend yield at 2.88%, compared with 0.76% for THEQ.

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for THEQ and 0.50% for HOLA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THEQ and HOLA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer