PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THEQ vs. HOLA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THEQ vs. HOLA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Hedged Equity ETF (THEQ) and JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THEQ achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly higher than HOLA's 8.34% return.


THEQ

1D
1.39%
1M
2.82%
6M
7.77%
YTD
8.91%
1Y
14.61%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.34%

HOLA

1D
0.81%
1M
2.18%
6M
4.25%
YTD
8.34%
1Y
17.50%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$887.21K$659.42K$1.16M
$177.26K$124.05K$169.23K

THEQ vs. HOLA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between THEQ and HOLA is 0.69, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.69

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2025

0.69

The correlation between THEQ and HOLA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.69 to 0.69 - a consistent structural relationship.

THEQ vs. HOLA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
THEQ
HOLA

Technology

35.4%
14.4%

Financial Services

12.3%
25.7%

Communication Services

10.8%
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.5%
8.1%

Healthcare

9.3%
9.8%

Industrials

7.8%
18.2%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
6.6%

Energy

3.6%
3.0%

Utilities

3.0%
4.3%

Basic Materials

1.7%
5.1%

Real Estate

1.6%
0.9%

Technology

THEQ
35.4%
HOLA
14.4%

Financial Services

THEQ
12.3%
HOLA
25.7%

Communication Services

THEQ
10.8%
HOLA
4.0%

Consumer Cyclical

THEQ
9.5%
HOLA
8.1%

Healthcare

THEQ
9.3%
HOLA
9.8%

Industrials

THEQ
7.8%
HOLA
18.2%

Consumer Defensive

THEQ
5.1%
HOLA
6.6%

Energy

THEQ
3.6%
HOLA
3.0%

Utilities

THEQ
3.0%
HOLA
4.3%

Basic Materials

THEQ
1.7%
HOLA
5.1%

Real Estate

THEQ
1.6%
HOLA
0.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THEQ vs. HOLA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

THEQ
THEQ Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
THEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
THEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
THEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
THEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

HOLA
HOLA Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
HOLA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HOLA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
HOLA Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
HOLA Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
HOLA Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

THEQ vs. HOLA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Hedged Equity ETF (THEQ) and JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


THEQHOLADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.31

-0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.38

2.51

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.54

8.52

+1.02

THEQ vs. HOLA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THEQ Sharpe Ratio is 1.57, which is comparable to the HOLA Sharpe Ratio of 1.75. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THEQ and HOLA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

THEQ vs. HOLA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THEQ drawdown since its inception was -8.20%, which is greater than HOLA's maximum drawdown of -6.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THEQ and HOLA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THEQHOLADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.20%

-6.99%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.17%

-6.99%

+0.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.07%

-1.39%

+0.32%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.54%

2.06%

-0.52%

Volatility

THEQ vs. HOLA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for T. Rowe Price Hedged Equity ETF (THEQ) is 3.18%, while JPMorgan International Hedged Equity Laddered Overlay ETF (HOLA) has a volatility of 3.53%. This indicates that THEQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than HOLA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THEQHOLADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.18%

3.53%

-0.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.39%

8.40%

-1.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.47%

10.12%

-0.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.55%

10.14%

+1.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.55%

10.14%

+1.41%

THEQ vs. HOLA - Expense Ratio Comparison

THEQ has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than HOLA's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

THEQ vs. HOLA - Dividend Comparison

THEQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.73%, less than HOLA's 2.79% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


THEQ and HOLA have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

HOLA has higher volatility (3.53%) compared to THEQ (3.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THEQ dropped -8.20% vs HOLA's -6.99%.

On 1-year performance, HOLA leads with 17.50% vs 14.61% for THEQ. On fees, THEQ is cheaper at 0.46% per year. On volatility, THEQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, HOLA has performed better with a 17.50% return vs 14.61%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

THEQ is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for HOLA.

HOLA has the higher dividend yield at 2.79%, compared with 0.73% for THEQ.

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for THEQ and 0.50% for HOLA.

HOLA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.75 vs 1.57), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THEQ and HOLA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer