THD vs. MKOR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

THD (iShares MSCI Thailand ETF) and MKOR (Matthews Korea Active ETF) are both Asia Pacific Equities funds. THD is passively managed, while MKOR is actively managed. Over the past year, THD returned 42.49% vs 187.66% for MKOR. At a 0.45 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. THD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.79%/yr for MKOR.

Performance

THD vs. MKOR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI Thailand ETF (THD) and Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THD achieves a 24.17% return, which is significantly lower than MKOR's 96.84% return.

THD

• 1D: -0.75%
• 1M: 5.54%
• YTD: 24.17%
• 6M: 25.06%
• 1Y: 42.49%
• 3Y*: 5.77%
• 5Y*: 0.86%
• 10Y*: 3.47%

MKOR

• 1D: -0.99%
• 1M: 16.82%
• YTD: 96.84%
• 6M: 107.34%
• 1Y: 187.66%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THD vs. MKOR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
THD iShares MSCI Thailand ETF	24.17%	2.36%	-2.21%	-5.27%
MKOR Matthews Korea Active ETF	96.84%	70.33%	-15.76%	-2.16%

Correlation

The correlation between THD and MKOR is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.44
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2023	0.45

THD vs. MKOR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	THD	MKOR
Industrials	29.3%	15.0%
Energy	14.3%	0.6%
Financial Services	11.2%	8.0%
Communication Services	10.3%	2.1%
Consumer Defensive	7.8%	1.7%
Utilities	6.7%	0.6%
Healthcare	6.4%	1.5%
Real Estate	5.1%	-
Consumer Cyclical	4.6%	7.0%
Basic Materials	3.5%	0.8%
Technology	0.9%	56.1%

Return for Risk

THD vs. MKOR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THD

THD Risk / Return Rank: 55
THD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
THD Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
THD Omega Ratio Rank: 50
THD Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
THD Martin Ratio Rank: 54

MKOR

MKOR Risk / Return Rank: 96
MKOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
MKOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
MKOR Omega Ratio Rank: 94
MKOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
MKOR Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THD vs. MKOR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI Thailand ETF (THD) and Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	THD	MKOR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.88	5.08	-3.20
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.60	4.94	-2.35
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.70	-0.38
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.25	9.16	-5.91
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	9.35	35.31	-25.95
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

THD vs. MKOR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THD Sharpe Ratio is 1.88, which is lower than the MKOR Sharpe Ratio of 5.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THD and MKOR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	THD	MKOR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.88	5.08	-3.20
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.16	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.18	1.57	-1.39

Drawdowns

THD vs. MKOR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THD drawdown since its inception was -64.22%, which is greater than MKOR's maximum drawdown of -22.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THD and MKOR.

Drawdown Indicators

	THD	MKOR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.22%	-22.09%	-42.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.12%	-20.62%	+7.50%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-34.11%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-40.24%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-49.32%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.82%	-2.27%	-6.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.28%	-6.22%	-12.06%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.58%	5.34%	-0.76%

Volatility

THD vs. MKOR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares MSCI Thailand ETF (THD) is 6.41%, while Matthews Korea Active ETF (MKOR) has a volatility of 17.87%. This indicates that THD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MKOR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	THD	MKOR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.41%	17.87%	-11.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	18.28%	33.29%	-15.01%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.67%	37.15%	-14.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.79%	27.06%	-7.27%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.58%	27.06%	-5.48%

THD vs. MKOR - Expense Ratio Comparison

THD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than MKOR's 0.79% expense ratio.

Dividends

THD vs. MKOR - Dividend Comparison

THD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.71%, more than MKOR's 1.33% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
MKOR Matthews Korea Active ETF	1.33%	2.62%	5.28%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
THD iShares MSCI Thailand ETF	2.71%	3.36%	3.15%	2.92%	2.41%	3.16%	2.31%	2.42%	2.57%	2.16%	2.61%	3.58%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both THD and MKOR in my portfolio?

THD and MKOR have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, THD or MKOR?

MKOR has higher volatility (17.87%) compared to THD (6.41%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THD dropped -64.22% vs MKOR's -22.09%.

Which ETF is better, THD or MKOR?

On 1-year performance, MKOR leads with 187.66% vs 42.49% for THD. On fees, THD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, THD has been the lower-risk option at 6.41%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, THD or MKOR?

Over the 1-year period, MKOR has performed better with a 187.66% return vs 42.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, THD or MKOR?

THD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for MKOR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, THD or MKOR?

THD has the higher dividend yield at 2.71%, compared with 1.33% for MKOR.

What is the main difference between THD and MKOR?

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Matthews. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for THD and 0.79% for MKOR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MKOR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.08 vs 1.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.