PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THCGX vs. TGVAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THCGX vs. TGVAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (THCGX) and Thornburg International Equity Fund (TGVAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THCGX achieves a 13.69% return, which is significantly higher than TGVAX's 10.14% return. Over the past 10 years, THCGX has underperformed TGVAX with an annualized return of 9.22%, while TGVAX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.74% annualized return.


THCGX

1D
1.96%
1M
3.63%
6M
9.99%
YTD
13.69%
1Y
22.53%
3Y*
12.96%
5Y*
0.73%
10Y*
9.22%

TGVAX

1D
0.28%
1M
-0.25%
6M
7.86%
YTD
10.14%
1Y
20.88%
3Y*
20.22%
5Y*
9.30%
10Y*
10.74%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THCGX vs. TGVAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
THCGX
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
13.69%4.31%19.67%19.56%-34.19%-4.97%41.70%28.95%-2.56%23.91%
TGVAX
Thornburg International Equity Fund
10.14%33.81%11.24%15.77%-17.04%7.25%22.59%28.67%-20.08%25.03%

Correlation

The correlation between THCGX and TGVAX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.51

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2001

0.62

The correlation between THCGX and TGVAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.47 (1 year) to 0.62 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THCGX vs. TGVAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THCGX
THCGX Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
THCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
THCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
THCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
THCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

TGVAX
TGVAX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
TGVAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGVAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGVAX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
TGVAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGVAX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THCGX vs. TGVAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (THCGX) and Thornburg International Equity Fund (TGVAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


THCGXTGVAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.56

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.29

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

1.95

-0.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.31

6.75

-2.43

THCGX vs. TGVAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the TGVAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THCGX and TGVAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

THCGX vs. TGVAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THCGX drawdown since its inception was -63.67%, which is greater than TGVAX's maximum drawdown of -56.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THCGX and TGVAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THCGXTGVAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.67%

-56.44%

-7.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.53%

-10.34%

-5.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.25%

-12.00%

-18.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.67%

-39.96%

-23.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.67%

-39.96%

-23.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-32.68%

-1.82%

-30.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.27%

-12.42%

-8.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.79%

2.99%

+1.80%

Volatility

THCGX vs. TGVAX - Volatility Comparison

Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (THCGX) has a higher volatility of 6.10% compared to Thornburg International Equity Fund (TGVAX) at 3.58%. This indicates that THCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TGVAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THCGXTGVAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.10%

3.58%

+2.52%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.82%

10.60%

+4.22%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.25%

12.74%

+7.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

37.02%

16.68%

+20.34%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.12%

16.50%

+13.62%

THCGX vs. TGVAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

THCGX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than TGVAX's 1.25% expense ratio.


Dividends

THCGX vs. TGVAX - Dividend Comparison

THCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TGVAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.22%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TGVAX
Thornburg International Equity Fund
3.22%3.54%6.90%2.23%1.69%14.24%2.98%6.60%1.45%17.24%1.67%18.63%
THCGX
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%54.25%6.23%9.32%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


THCGX and TGVAX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THCGX has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to TGVAX (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THCGX dropped -63.67% vs TGVAX's -56.44%.

TGVAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THCGX and TGVAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer