PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
THCGX vs. BBLIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

THCGX vs. BBLIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (THCGX) and BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund (BBLIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, THCGX achieves a 12.03% return, which is significantly higher than BBLIX's 1.58% return.


THCGX

1D
1.62%
1M
3.45%
YTD
12.03%
6M
7.87%
1Y
25.32%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
1.30%
10Y*
9.25%

BBLIX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.00%
YTD
1.58%
6M
1.58%
1Y
8.77%
3Y*
12.83%
5Y*
8.65%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

THCGX vs. BBLIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
THCGX
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
12.03%4.31%19.67%19.56%-34.19%-4.97%41.70%5.93%
BBLIX
BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund
1.58%12.07%15.83%23.86%-20.59%27.23%12.30%3.63%

Correlation

The correlation between THCGX and BBLIX is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.62

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2019

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between THCGX and BBLIX has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

THCGX vs. BBLIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

THCGX
THCGX Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
THCGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
THCGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
THCGX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
THCGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
THCGX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

BBLIX
BBLIX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
BBLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BBLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
BBLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
BBLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
BBLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

THCGX vs. BBLIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (THCGX) and BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund (BBLIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


THCGXBBLIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.35

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

2.84

-1.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.27

5.39

-0.11

THCGX vs. BBLIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current THCGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is comparable to the BBLIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of THCGX and BBLIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

THCGX vs. BBLIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum THCGX drawdown since its inception was -63.67%, which is greater than BBLIX's maximum drawdown of -33.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for THCGX and BBLIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


THCGXBBLIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-63.67%

-33.49%

-30.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.53%

-3.63%

-11.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.25%

-14.68%

-15.57%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.67%

-28.06%

-35.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.67%

-1.80%

-31.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.24%

-6.32%

-14.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.77%

1.81%

+2.96%

Volatility

THCGX vs. BBLIX - Volatility Comparison

Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund (THCGX) has a higher volatility of 6.14% compared to BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund (BBLIX) at 0.00%. This indicates that THCGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBLIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


THCGXBBLIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.14%

0.00%

+6.14%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.70%

4.30%

+10.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.10%

7.48%

+12.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

36.99%

15.91%

+21.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

30.18%

18.48%

+11.70%

THCGX vs. BBLIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

THCGX has a 1.31% expense ratio, which is higher than BBLIX's 0.70% expense ratio.


Dividends

THCGX vs. BBLIX - Dividend Comparison

THCGX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BBLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.39%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
BBLIX
BBH Select Series - Large Cap Fund
9.39%9.54%4.20%0.28%1.45%3.27%0.34%0.04%
THCGX
Thornburg Small/Mid Cap Growth Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%54.25%6.23%9.32%

Frequently Asked Questions


THCGX and BBLIX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

THCGX has higher volatility (6.14%) compared to BBLIX (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, THCGX dropped -63.67% vs BBLIX's -33.49%.

BBLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.39 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for THCGX and BBLIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer