PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGWFX vs. TLOFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGWFX vs. TLOFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Large Growth Fund (TGWFX) and Transamerica Large Value Opportunities (TLOFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGWFX achieves a 3.49% return, which is significantly lower than TLOFX's 8.69% return.


TGWFX

1D
0.17%
1M
2.51%
YTD
3.49%
6M
1.52%
1Y
17.07%
3Y*
24.91%
5Y*
7.24%
10Y*
16.25%

TLOFX

1D
0.84%
1M
2.68%
YTD
8.69%
6M
9.33%
1Y
17.54%
3Y*
15.88%
5Y*
9.64%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGWFX vs. TLOFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TGWFX
Transamerica Large Growth Fund
3.49%19.57%37.05%43.40%-46.00%10.81%72.98%34.38%-0.64%21.39%
TLOFX
Transamerica Large Value Opportunities
8.69%9.67%18.60%7.98%-3.84%28.85%-1.14%23.15%-9.05%14.24%

Correlation

The correlation between TGWFX and TLOFX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.57

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2017

0.59

The correlation between TGWFX and TLOFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGWFX vs. TLOFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGWFX
TGWFX Risk / Return Rank: 99
Overall Rank
TGWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1010
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1010
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
TGWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 88
Martin Ratio Rank

TLOFX
TLOFX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
TLOFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3737
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TLOFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
TLOFX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
TLOFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
TLOFX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGWFX vs. TLOFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Large Growth Fund (TGWFX) and Transamerica Large Value Opportunities (TLOFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TGWFXTLOFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.30

-0.15

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.79

2.11

-1.32

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.09

8.60

-6.50

TGWFX vs. TLOFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGWFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is lower than the TLOFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGWFX and TLOFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TGWFXTLOFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

1.68

-0.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

0.57

-0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.53

0.53

-0.01

Drawdowns

TGWFX vs. TLOFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGWFX drawdown since its inception was -56.40%, which is greater than TLOFX's maximum drawdown of -37.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGWFX and TLOFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGWFXTLOFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.40%

-37.99%

-18.41%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.19%

-8.18%

-13.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.84%

-15.28%

-13.56%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.40%

-24.34%

-32.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.24%

0.00%

-3.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.81%

-6.31%

-7.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.93%

2.00%

+5.93%

Volatility

TGWFX vs. TLOFX - Volatility Comparison

Transamerica Large Growth Fund (TGWFX) has a higher volatility of 5.97% compared to Transamerica Large Value Opportunities (TLOFX) at 2.11%. This indicates that TGWFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TLOFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGWFXTLOFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.97%

2.11%

+3.86%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.09%

7.58%

+8.51%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.25%

10.26%

+10.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.42%

16.94%

+15.48%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.72%

18.70%

+9.02%

TGWFX vs. TLOFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGWFX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than TLOFX's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TGWFX vs. TLOFX - Dividend Comparison

TGWFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 36.08%, more than TLOFX's 13.78% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
TGWFX
Transamerica Large Growth Fund
36.08%37.34%21.74%0.00%1.42%25.01%16.24%21.28%9.80%4.38%
TLOFX
Transamerica Large Value Opportunities
13.78%15.11%23.72%1.73%8.52%17.26%2.02%2.52%23.00%3.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGWFX and TLOFX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TGWFX has higher volatility (5.97%) compared to TLOFX (2.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGWFX dropped -56.40% vs TLOFX's -37.99%.

TLOFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.68 vs 0.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGWFX and TLOFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer