PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGWFX vs. FTQGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGWFX vs. FTQGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Large Growth Fund (TGWFX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGWFX achieves a -2.79% return, which is significantly lower than FTQGX's 18.58% return. Over the past 10 years, TGWFX has underperformed FTQGX with an annualized return of 15.16%, while FTQGX has yielded a comparatively higher 17.90% annualized return.


TGWFX

1D
2.58%
1M
-4.62%
6M
1.83%
YTD
-2.79%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
3.84%
10Y*
15.16%
ALL TIME*
14.85%

FTQGX

1D
2.20%
1M
-5.27%
6M
14.61%
YTD
18.58%
1Y
29.14%
3Y*
24.19%
5Y*
13.72%
10Y*
17.90%
ALL TIME*
10.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TGWFX vs. FTQGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TGWFX
Transamerica Large Growth Fund
-2.79%19.57%37.05%43.40%-46.00%10.81%72.98%34.38%-0.64%32.45%
FTQGX
Fidelity Focused Stock Fund
18.58%13.65%36.95%28.94%-26.68%26.91%33.41%31.44%4.90%30.66%

Correlation

The correlation between TGWFX and FTQGX is 0.74, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.74

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.81

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.81

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.86

The correlation between TGWFX and FTQGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.74 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGWFX vs. FTQGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TGWFX
TGWFX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
TGWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
TGWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

FTQGX
FTQGX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
FTQGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTQGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3838
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTQGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
FTQGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTQGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TGWFX vs. FTQGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Large Growth Fund (TGWFX) and Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TGWFXFTQGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.37

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.21

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

2.03

-1.95

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.20

6.94

-6.73

TGWFX vs. FTQGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGWFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the FTQGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGWFX and FTQGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TGWFX vs. FTQGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGWFX drawdown since its inception was -56.40%, smaller than the maximum FTQGX drawdown of -61.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGWFX and FTQGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGWFXFTQGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.40%

-61.29%

+4.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.19%

-12.76%

-8.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.84%

-26.84%

-2.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.40%

-32.31%

-24.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.40%

-32.31%

-24.09%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.12%

-10.41%

+1.29%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.73%

-14.14%

+0.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.39%

3.73%

+4.66%

Volatility

TGWFX vs. FTQGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Transamerica Large Growth Fund (TGWFX) is 6.20%, while Fidelity Focused Stock Fund (FTQGX) has a volatility of 6.79%. This indicates that TGWFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTQGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGWFXFTQGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.20%

6.79%

-0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.01%

18.80%

-0.79%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.03%

22.84%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.66%

22.25%

+10.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.86%

21.83%

+6.03%

TGWFX vs. FTQGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGWFX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FTQGX's 0.69% expense ratio.


Dividends

TGWFX vs. FTQGX - Dividend Comparison

TGWFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.41%, more than FTQGX's 10.49% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FTQGX
Fidelity Focused Stock Fund
10.49%12.44%9.94%0.61%7.96%13.53%11.41%5.07%14.71%5.89%1.08%5.91%
TGWFX
Transamerica Large Growth Fund
38.41%37.34%21.74%0.00%1.42%25.01%16.24%21.28%9.80%4.38%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGWFX and FTQGX have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTQGX has higher volatility (6.79%) compared to TGWFX (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGWFX dropped -56.40% vs FTQGX's -61.29%.

FTQGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.14 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGWFX and FTQGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer