PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGWFX vs. FDSSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGWFX vs. FDSSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Large Growth Fund (TGWFX) and Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGWFX achieves a -2.79% return, which is significantly lower than FDSSX's 14.50% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with TGWFX having a 15.16% annualized return and FDSSX not far behind at 14.84%.


TGWFX

1D
2.58%
1M
-4.62%
6M
1.83%
YTD
-2.79%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
3.84%
10Y*
15.16%
ALL TIME*
14.85%

FDSSX

1D
1.87%
1M
-0.79%
6M
11.52%
YTD
14.50%
1Y
28.35%
3Y*
19.68%
5Y*
12.00%
10Y*
14.84%
ALL TIME*
11.46%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TGWFX vs. FDSSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TGWFX
Transamerica Large Growth Fund
-2.79%19.57%37.05%43.40%-46.00%10.81%72.98%34.38%-0.64%32.45%
FDSSX
Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund
14.50%18.89%19.79%26.94%-19.55%23.14%24.90%32.21%-8.61%24.42%

Correlation

The correlation between TGWFX and FDSSX is 0.81, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.86

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.86

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.87

The correlation between TGWFX and FDSSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGWFX vs. FDSSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TGWFX
TGWFX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
TGWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
TGWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

FDSSX
FDSSX Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FDSSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDSSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDSSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
FDSSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDSSX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TGWFX vs. FDSSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Large Growth Fund (TGWFX) and Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TGWFXFDSSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.24

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.33

-0.29

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

2.83

-2.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.20

12.79

-12.59

TGWFX vs. FDSSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGWFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the FDSSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGWFX and FDSSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TGWFX vs. FDSSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGWFX drawdown since its inception was -56.40%, roughly equal to the maximum FDSSX drawdown of -56.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGWFX and FDSSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGWFXFDSSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.40%

-56.77%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.19%

-9.19%

-12.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.84%

-20.86%

-7.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.40%

-25.22%

-31.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.40%

-34.37%

-22.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.12%

-2.29%

-6.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.73%

-9.85%

-3.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.39%

2.03%

+6.36%

Volatility

TGWFX vs. FDSSX - Volatility Comparison

Transamerica Large Growth Fund (TGWFX) has a higher volatility of 6.20% compared to Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund (FDSSX) at 3.73%. This indicates that TGWFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDSSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGWFXFDSSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.20%

3.73%

+2.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.01%

11.38%

+6.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.03%

14.26%

+8.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.66%

17.90%

+14.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.86%

18.58%

+9.28%

TGWFX vs. FDSSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGWFX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FDSSX's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

TGWFX vs. FDSSX - Dividend Comparison

TGWFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.41%, more than FDSSX's 4.18% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDSSX
Fidelity Stock Selector All Cap Fund
4.18%4.79%4.83%2.03%0.36%0.84%5.22%6.09%4.46%3.07%1.04%5.16%
TGWFX
Transamerica Large Growth Fund
38.41%37.34%21.74%0.00%1.42%25.01%16.24%21.28%9.80%4.38%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGWFX and FDSSX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TGWFX has higher volatility (6.20%) compared to FDSSX (3.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGWFX dropped -56.40% vs FDSSX's -56.77%.

FDSSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGWFX and FDSSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer