PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGWFX vs. CHASX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGWFX vs. CHASX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Transamerica Large Growth Fund (TGWFX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGWFX achieves a -2.79% return, which is significantly lower than CHASX's 22.47% return. Over the past 10 years, TGWFX has underperformed CHASX with an annualized return of 15.16%, while CHASX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.51% annualized return.


TGWFX

1D
2.58%
1M
-4.62%
6M
1.83%
YTD
-2.79%
1Y
3.91%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
3.84%
10Y*
15.16%
ALL TIME*
14.85%

CHASX

1D
2.60%
1M
-0.77%
6M
18.71%
YTD
22.47%
1Y
37.51%
3Y*
37.85%
5Y*
20.82%
10Y*
19.51%
ALL TIME*
11.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

TGWFX vs. CHASX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TGWFX
Transamerica Large Growth Fund
-2.79%19.57%37.05%43.40%-46.00%10.81%72.98%34.38%-0.64%32.45%
CHASX
Chase Growth Fund
22.47%20.61%64.71%25.91%-20.41%22.32%18.27%42.63%-3.96%24.49%

Correlation

The correlation between TGWFX and CHASX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 3, 2012

0.84

The correlation between TGWFX and CHASX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGWFX vs. CHASX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TGWFX
TGWFX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
TGWFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGWFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGWFX Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
TGWFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGWFX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

CHASX
CHASX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
CHASX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHASX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7474
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHASX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
CHASX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHASX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TGWFX vs. CHASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Transamerica Large Growth Fund (TGWFX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TGWFXCHASXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.73

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.03

1.31

-0.28

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.08

3.52

-3.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.20

13.93

-13.72

TGWFX vs. CHASX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGWFX Sharpe Ratio is 0.07, which is lower than the CHASX Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGWFX and CHASX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TGWFX vs. CHASX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGWFX drawdown since its inception was -56.40%, which is greater than CHASX's maximum drawdown of -45.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGWFX and CHASX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGWFXCHASXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-56.40%

-45.94%

-10.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.19%

-9.90%

-11.29%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.84%

-23.40%

-5.44%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.40%

-24.63%

-31.77%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-56.40%

-30.40%

-26.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.12%

-3.73%

-5.39%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.73%

-9.11%

-4.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.39%

2.50%

+5.89%

Volatility

TGWFX vs. CHASX - Volatility Comparison

Transamerica Large Growth Fund (TGWFX) and Chase Growth Fund (CHASX) have volatilities of 6.20% and 6.38%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGWFXCHASXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.20%

6.38%

-0.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.01%

15.31%

+2.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.03%

19.29%

+3.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

32.66%

20.53%

+12.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

27.86%

20.04%

+7.82%

TGWFX vs. CHASX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGWFX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than CHASX's 1.14% expense ratio.


Dividends

TGWFX vs. CHASX - Dividend Comparison

TGWFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 38.41%, more than CHASX's 7.45% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CHASX
Chase Growth Fund
7.45%9.12%36.67%5.80%5.49%20.15%7.83%22.82%12.92%11.92%9.14%10.24%
TGWFX
Transamerica Large Growth Fund
38.41%37.34%21.74%0.00%1.42%25.01%16.24%21.28%9.80%4.38%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGWFX and CHASX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CHASX has higher volatility (6.38%) compared to TGWFX (6.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGWFX dropped -56.40% vs CHASX's -45.94%.

CHASX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGWFX and CHASX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer