PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGRO.TO vs. XEG.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGRO.TO vs. XEG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGRO.TO achieves a 11.07% return, which is significantly lower than XEG.TO's 46.30% return.


TGRO.TO

1D
0.03%
1M
-0.75%
6M
8.72%
YTD
11.07%
1Y
23.14%
3Y*
18.20%
5Y*
12.14%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
13.78%

XEG.TO

1D
0.69%
1M
15.08%
6M
33.01%
YTD
46.30%
1Y
65.86%
3Y*
24.75%
5Y*
32.72%
10Y*
12.29%
ALL TIME*
4.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$1.03MCA$1.36MCA$1.47M
CA$58.70MCA$53.16MCA$56.38M

TGRO.TO vs. XEG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio
11.07%18.03%21.06%18.36%-11.39%20.64%7.27%
XEG.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF
46.30%16.72%14.04%3.55%53.25%83.71%10.77%

Correlation

The correlation between TGRO.TO and XEG.TO is -0.12, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.12

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2020

0.21

The correlation between TGRO.TO and XEG.TO shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.21 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGRO.TO vs. XEG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

TGRO.TO
TGRO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
TGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

XEG.TO
XEG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8888
Sortino Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
XEG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

TGRO.TO vs. XEG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO) and iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TGRO.TOXEG.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.53

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.41

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.03

3.82

-0.79

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

12.84

11.60

+1.24

TGRO.TO vs. XEG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is comparable to the XEG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGRO.TO and XEG.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TGRO.TO vs. XEG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGRO.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.37%, smaller than the maximum XEG.TO drawdown of -87.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGRO.TO and XEG.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGRO.TOXEG.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.37%

-87.51%

+69.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.21%

-16.47%

+9.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.53%

-25.67%

+12.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.37%

-28.42%

+10.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-2.70%

+1.55%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.42%

-34.46%

+31.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.70%

5.44%

-3.74%

Volatility

TGRO.TO vs. XEG.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO) is 3.06%, while iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF (XEG.TO) has a volatility of 8.21%. This indicates that TGRO.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XEG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGRO.TOXEG.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.06%

8.21%

-5.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.79%

20.17%

-11.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.69%

24.45%

-13.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.83%

28.62%

-16.79%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.59%

33.42%

-21.83%

TGRO.TO vs. XEG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGRO.TO has a 0.17% expense ratio, which is lower than XEG.TO's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

TGRO.TO vs. XEG.TO - Dividend Comparison

TGRO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, less than XEG.TO's 2.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio
1.73%2.03%2.06%2.16%2.46%1.71%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XEG.TO
iShares S&P/TSX Capped Energy Index ETF
2.52%3.63%3.46%4.26%3.31%1.64%2.96%2.70%2.25%1.41%1.40%3.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGRO.TO and XEG.TO have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TGRO.TO is cheaper at 0.17% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TGRO.TO is cheaper with a 0.17% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for XEG.TO.

TGRO.TO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while XEG.TO is Energy Equities. They also come from different issuers: TD and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.17% for TGRO.TO and 0.60% for XEG.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGRO.TO and XEG.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer