PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
TGRO.TO vs. XBAL.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

TGRO.TO vs. XBAL.TO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

TGRO.TO (TD Growth ETF Portfolio) and XBAL.TO (iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, TGRO.TO returned 13.41%/yr vs 8.24%/yr for XBAL.TO. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TGRO.TO charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for XBAL.TO.

Performance

TGRO.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO) and iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio (XBAL.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGRO.TO achieves a 10.65% return, which is significantly higher than XBAL.TO's 8.30% return.

TGRO.TO

1D
0.66%
1M
5.30%
YTD
10.65%
6M
10.15%
1Y
26.43%
3Y*
20.02%
5Y*
13.41%
10Y*
—

XBAL.TO

1D
0.45%
1M
4.08%
YTD
8.30%
6M
6.25%
1Y
17.97%
3Y*
14.47%
5Y*
8.24%
10Y*
7.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGRO.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio		10.65%18.03%22.28%18.36%-11.39%20.46%2,565.79%
XBAL.TO
iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio		8.30%11.87%15.76%13.01%-11.19%10.11%5.99%

Correlation

The correlation between TGRO.TO and XBAL.TO is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2020

0.85

The correlation between TGRO.TO and XBAL.TO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

TD Growth ETF Portfolio

iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio

Often compared with TGRO.TO:
TGRO.TO vs. VGRO.TOTGRO.TO vs. XEQT.TOTGRO.TO vs. XGRO.TOTGRO.TO vs. ZGRO.TOTGRO.TO vs. TBAL.TOTGRO.TO vs. TEQT.TOTGRO.TO vs. TPU.TO
Often compared with XBAL.TO:
XBAL.TO vs. XEQT.TOXBAL.TO vs. VBAL.TOXBAL.TO vs. XCNS.TOXBAL.TO vs. XEI.TOXBAL.TO vs. ZBAL.TOXBAL.TO vs. ZLB.TOXBAL.TO vs. GBAL.TO

Return for Risk

TGRO.TO vs. XBAL.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
TGRO.TO
TGRO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
TGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
XBAL.TO
XBAL.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
XBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XBAL.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XBAL.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
XBAL.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
XBAL.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGRO.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO) and iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio (XBAL.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

TGRO.TOXBAL.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
2.67
2.12

+0.55

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
3.73
2.94

+0.79

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.50

1.40

+0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.68

2.98

+0.71

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.25

12.49

+3.76

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TGRO.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the XBAL.TO Sharpe Ratio of 2.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGRO.TO and XBAL.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

TGRO.TOXBAL.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

2.12

+0.55

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.15

0.94

+0.21

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

—

0.82

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.68

-0.58

Drawdowns

TGRO.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGRO.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.37%, smaller than the maximum XBAL.TO drawdown of -28.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGRO.TO and XBAL.TO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

TGRO.TOXBAL.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.37%

-28.83%

+10.46%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.21%

-6.06%

-1.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.27%

-9.35%

-3.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.37%

-17.12%

-1.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-20.93%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.45%

-3.39%

-0.06%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

1.44%

+0.19%

Volatility

TGRO.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Volatility Comparison

TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO) and iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio (XBAL.TO) have volatilities of 3.29% and 3.14%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

TGRO.TOXBAL.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.29%

3.14%

+0.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.12%

7.22%

+0.90%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.95%

8.52%

+1.43%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.69%

8.79%

+2.90%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

994.74%

9.37%

+985.37%

TGRO.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGRO.TO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than XBAL.TO's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

TGRO.TO vs. XBAL.TO - Dividend Comparison

TGRO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.77%, less than XBAL.TO's 2.09% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio		1.77%2.03%2.04%2.17%2.46%1.58%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XBAL.TO
iShares Core Balanced ETF Portfolio		2.09%2.24%2.68%2.40%2.09%1.74%1.99%2.26%3.39%2.93%3.64%3.29%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.92, TGRO.TO and XBAL.TO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, TGRO.TO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TGRO.TO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XBAL.TO.

They also come from different issuers: TD and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TGRO.TO and 0.20% for XBAL.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGRO.TO and XBAL.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer