PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGRO.TO vs. TDB.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGRO.TO vs. TDB.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO) and TD Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (TDB.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGRO.TO achieves a 9.93% return, which is significantly higher than TDB.TO's 1.60% return.


TGRO.TO

1D
-0.38%
1M
5.22%
YTD
9.93%
6M
9.81%
1Y
25.55%
3Y*
19.69%
5Y*
13.26%
10Y*

TDB.TO

1D
-0.08%
1M
1.60%
YTD
1.60%
6M
0.82%
1Y
3.01%
3Y*
4.14%
5Y*
0.78%
10Y*
1.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGRO.TO vs. TDB.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio
9.93%18.03%22.28%18.36%-11.39%20.46%2,565.79%
TDB.TO
TD Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF
1.60%2.24%4.11%6.57%-10.94%-2.98%0.62%

Correlation

The correlation between TGRO.TO and TDB.TO is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.22

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2020

0.21

The correlation between TGRO.TO and TDB.TO shifts across timeframes, from 0.21 (all time) to 0.40 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGRO.TO vs. TDB.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGRO.TO
TGRO.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
TGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGRO.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank

TDB.TO
TDB.TO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
TDB.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TDB.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
TDB.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
TDB.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
TDB.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGRO.TO vs. TDB.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO) and TD Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (TDB.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TGRO.TOTDB.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.65

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.13

+0.36

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

1.10

+2.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.71

2.55

+13.16

TGRO.TO vs. TDB.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGRO.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the TDB.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGRO.TO and TDB.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TGRO.TOTDB.TODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.58

0.69

+1.90

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

0.12

+1.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.10

0.27

-0.17

Drawdowns

TGRO.TO vs. TDB.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGRO.TO drawdown since its inception was -18.37%, which is greater than TDB.TO's maximum drawdown of -17.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGRO.TO and TDB.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGRO.TOTDB.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.37%

-17.29%

-1.08%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.21%

-2.74%

-4.47%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.27%

-5.11%

-8.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.37%

-15.14%

-3.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-17.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.41%

-0.85%

+0.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.46%

-4.73%

+1.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.63%

1.18%

+0.45%

Volatility

TGRO.TO vs. TDB.TO - Volatility Comparison

TD Growth ETF Portfolio (TGRO.TO) has a higher volatility of 3.28% compared to TD Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF (TDB.TO) at 1.64%. This indicates that TGRO.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TDB.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGRO.TOTDB.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.28%

1.64%

+1.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.10%

3.39%

+4.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.93%

4.40%

+5.53%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.69%

6.38%

+5.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

995.08%

6.59%

+988.49%

TGRO.TO vs. TDB.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGRO.TO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is higher than TDB.TO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

TGRO.TO vs. TDB.TO - Dividend Comparison

TGRO.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.78%, less than TDB.TO's 3.51% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
TDB.TO
TD Canadian Aggregate Bond Index ETF
3.51%3.71%4.11%4.11%2.67%2.37%2.38%2.05%4.32%2.94%2.45%
TGRO.TO
TD Growth ETF Portfolio
1.78%2.03%2.04%2.17%2.46%1.58%0.83%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGRO.TO and TDB.TO have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TDB.TO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TDB.TO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.15% for TGRO.TO.

TGRO.TO is categorized as Diversified Portfolio, while TDB.TO is Canadian Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for TGRO.TO and 0.08% for TDB.TO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGRO.TO and TDB.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer