TGLB vs. WBIG
TGLB (T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF) and WBIG (WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF) are both Global Equities funds. Over the past year, TGLB returned 13.13% vs 20.07% for WBIG. A 0.64 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. TGLB charges 0.46%/yr vs 1.14%/yr for WBIG.
Performance
TGLB vs. WBIG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGLB achieves a 8.78% return, which is significantly lower than WBIG's 9.91% return.
TGLB
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -1.24%
- YTD
- 8.78%
- 6M
- 7.27%
- 1Y
- 13.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WBIG
- 1D
- 0.34%
- 1M
- 3.07%
- YTD
- 9.91%
- 6M
- 8.73%
- 1Y
- 20.07%
- 3Y*
- 5.89%
- 5Y*
- 1.17%
- 10Y*
- 4.26%
TGLB vs. WBIG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TGLB T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF | 8.78% | 3.99% |
WBIG WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF | 9.91% | 9.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGLB and WBIG is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.64 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGLB vs. WBIG — Risk / Return Rank
TGLB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WBIG
TGLB vs. WBIG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF (TGLB) and WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF (WBIG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TGLB | WBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.36 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.98 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 12.38 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TGLB vs. WBIG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGLB drawdown since its inception was -9.78%, smaller than the maximum WBIG drawdown of -25.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGLB and WBIG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGLB | WBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.78% | -25.32% | +15.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.78% | -5.06% | -4.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -20.20% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.32% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -25.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.49% | -3.74% | +0.25% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.83% | -10.89% | +9.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.62% | — |
Volatility
TGLB vs. WBIG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGLB | WBIG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.60% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 6.93% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.21% | 10.10% | +4.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 12.05% | +2.16% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.21% | 11.56% | +2.65% |
TGLB vs. WBIG - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGLB has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than WBIG's 1.14% expense ratio.
Dividends
TGLB vs. WBIG - Dividend Comparison
TGLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than WBIG's 1.20% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGLB T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF | 0.18% | 0.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WBIG WBI BullBear Yield 3000 ETF | 1.20% | 1.74% | 2.05% | 1.74% | 1.29% | 2.94% | 0.90% | 1.87% | 1.20% | 1.27% | 0.96% | 1.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TGLB and WBIG have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, WBIG leads with 20.07% vs 13.13% for TGLB. On fees, TGLB is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WBIG has performed better with a 20.07% return vs 13.13%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TGLB is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 1.14% for WBIG.
WBIG has the higher dividend yield at 1.20%, compared with 0.18% for TGLB.
They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and WBI. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for TGLB and 1.14% for WBIG.
Find the right allocation for TGLB and WBIG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer