PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGLB vs. UFO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGLB vs. UFO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF (TGLB) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGLB achieves a 8.79% return, which is significantly lower than UFO's 41.55% return.


TGLB

1D
-3.09%
1M
0.39%
YTD
8.79%
6M
8.19%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

UFO

1D
-7.80%
1M
3.81%
YTD
41.55%
6M
53.43%
1Y
114.27%
3Y*
42.70%
5Y*
14.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGLB vs. UFO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
TGLB
T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF
8.79%3.38%
UFO
Procure Space ETF
41.55%36.10%

Correlation

The correlation between TGLB and UFO is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.60

TGLB vs. UFO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TGLB
UFO

Technology

32.3%
22.0%

Financial Services

15.7%

-

Communication Services

9.0%
30.8%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%

-

Industrials

6.5%
47.2%

Basic Materials

6.0%

-

Energy

3.5%

-

Healthcare

3.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.1%

-

Utilities

0.9%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

TGLB
32.3%
UFO
22.0%

Financial Services

TGLB
15.7%
UFO

-

Communication Services

TGLB
9.0%
UFO
30.8%

Consumer Cyclical

TGLB
8.4%
UFO

-

Industrials

TGLB
6.5%
UFO
47.2%

Basic Materials

TGLB
6.0%
UFO

-

Energy

TGLB
3.5%
UFO

-

Healthcare

TGLB
3.1%
UFO

-

Consumer Defensive

TGLB
1.1%
UFO

-

Utilities

TGLB
0.9%
UFO

-

Real Estate

TGLB

-

UFO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGLB vs. UFO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGLB

UFO
UFO Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
UFO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UFO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
UFO Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
UFO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UFO Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGLB vs. UFO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF (TGLB) and Procure Space ETF (UFO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TGLB vs. UFO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TGLBUFODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.95

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.43

+0.52

Drawdowns

TGLB vs. UFO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGLB drawdown since its inception was -9.78%, smaller than the maximum UFO drawdown of -50.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGLB and UFO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGLBUFODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.78%

-50.33%

+40.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-21.95%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-50.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.48%

-19.31%

+15.83%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.80%

-21.81%

+20.01%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.88%

Volatility

TGLB vs. UFO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGLBUFODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

18.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

32.41%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.06%

39.00%

-24.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.06%

30.14%

-16.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.06%

30.90%

-16.84%

TGLB vs. UFO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGLB has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than UFO's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

TGLB vs. UFO - Dividend Comparison

TGLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than UFO's 0.30% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
TGLB
T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF
0.18%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UFO
Procure Space ETF
0.30%0.46%1.98%1.90%3.19%1.00%1.07%0.45%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGLB and UFO have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TGLB is cheaper at 0.46% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TGLB is cheaper with a 0.46% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UFO.

UFO has the higher dividend yield at 0.30%, compared with 0.18% for TGLB.

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and ProcureAM. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for TGLB and 0.75% for UFO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGLB and UFO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer