PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGLB vs. TSPA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGLB vs. TSPA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF (TGLB) and T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with TGLB having a 8.79% return and TSPA slightly lower at 8.74%.


TGLB

1D
-3.09%
1M
0.39%
YTD
8.79%
6M
8.19%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TSPA

1D
-2.78%
1M
0.02%
YTD
8.74%
6M
8.66%
1Y
25.33%
3Y*
22.01%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGLB vs. TSPA - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TGLB and TSPA is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 27, 2025

0.91

TGLB vs. TSPA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
TGLB
TSPA

Technology

32.3%
33.6%

Financial Services

15.7%
12.8%

Communication Services

9.0%
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

8.4%
9.9%

Industrials

6.5%
8.0%

Basic Materials

6.0%
1.9%

Energy

3.5%
4.1%

Healthcare

3.1%
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

1.1%
5.0%

Utilities

0.9%
2.6%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

TGLB
32.3%
TSPA
33.6%

Financial Services

TGLB
15.7%
TSPA
12.8%

Communication Services

TGLB
9.0%
TSPA
10.7%

Consumer Cyclical

TGLB
8.4%
TSPA
9.9%

Industrials

TGLB
6.5%
TSPA
8.0%

Basic Materials

TGLB
6.0%
TSPA
1.9%

Energy

TGLB
3.5%
TSPA
4.1%

Healthcare

TGLB
3.1%
TSPA
9.5%

Consumer Defensive

TGLB
1.1%
TSPA
5.0%

Utilities

TGLB
0.9%
TSPA
2.6%

Real Estate

TGLB

-

TSPA
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGLB vs. TSPA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGLB

TSPA
TSPA Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
TSPA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TSPA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
TSPA Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
TSPA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
TSPA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGLB vs. TSPA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF (TGLB) and T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF (TSPA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TGLB vs. TSPA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TGLBTSPADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.02

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.95

0.83

+0.12

Drawdowns

TGLB vs. TSPA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGLB drawdown since its inception was -9.78%, smaller than the maximum TSPA drawdown of -24.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGLB and TSPA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGLBTSPADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.78%

-24.72%

+14.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.48%

-2.96%

-0.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.80%

-5.49%

+3.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

Volatility

TGLB vs. TSPA - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGLBTSPADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.06%

12.59%

+1.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.06%

17.03%

-2.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.06%

17.03%

-2.97%

TGLB vs. TSPA - Expense Ratio Comparison

TGLB has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than TSPA's 0.34% expense ratio.


Dividends

TGLB vs. TSPA - Dividend Comparison

TGLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.18%, less than TSPA's 0.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
TGLB
T. Rowe Price Global Equity ETF
0.18%0.20%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TSPA
T. Rowe Price US Equity Research ETF
0.57%0.62%0.50%0.41%1.16%0.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, TGLB and TSPA move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, TSPA is cheaper at 0.34% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TSPA is cheaper with a 0.34% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for TGLB.

TSPA has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.18% for TGLB.

TGLB is categorized as Global Equities, while TSPA is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for TGLB and 0.34% for TSPA.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGLB and TSPA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer