TGFRX vs. FAMVX
TGFRX (Tanaka Growth Fund) and FAMVX (FAM Value Fund) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TGFRX returned 14.83%/yr vs 10.43%/yr for FAMVX. Their 0.70 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. TGFRX charges 2.19%/yr vs 1.19%/yr for FAMVX.
Performance
TGFRX vs. FAMVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGFRX achieves a 14.64% return, which is significantly higher than FAMVX's 9.72% return. Over the past 10 years, TGFRX has outperformed FAMVX with an annualized return of 14.83%, while FAMVX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.43% annualized return.
TGFRX
- 1D
- 1.58%
- 1M
- -1.75%
- 6M
- 5.03%
- YTD
- 14.64%
- 1Y
- 39.87%
- 3Y*
- 27.42%
- 5Y*
- 14.01%
- 10Y*
- 14.83%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.00%
FAMVX
- 1D
- 0.95%
- 1M
- 1.52%
- 6M
- 7.03%
- YTD
- 9.72%
- 1Y
- 11.45%
- 3Y*
- 12.58%
- 5Y*
- 7.29%
- 10Y*
- 10.43%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.85%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
FAMVX FAM Value Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
TGFRX Tanaka Growth Fund | $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
TGFRX vs. FAMVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGFRX Tanaka Growth Fund | 14.64% | 39.56% | 17.98% | 50.24% | -22.62% | 26.54% | 50.87% | 18.78% | -25.18% | 7.28% |
FAMVX FAM Value Fund | 9.72% | 4.90% | 15.51% | 16.09% | -14.06% | 25.65% | 6.81% | 30.31% | -6.15% | 17.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGFRX and FAMVX is 0.42, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.42 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.67 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 1999 | 0.70 |
Over the past year, the correlation between TGFRX and FAMVX has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.70, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGFRX vs. FAMVX — Risk / Return Rank
TGFRX
FAMVX
TGFRX vs. FAMVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX) and FAM Value Fund (FAMVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TGFRX | FAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.17 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.80 | 1.37 | +1.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.72 | 4.19 | +2.53 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TGFRX vs. FAMVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGFRX drawdown since its inception was -74.43%, which is greater than FAMVX's maximum drawdown of -51.12%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGFRX and FAMVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGFRX | FAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -74.43% | -51.12% | -23.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.01% | -9.47% | -6.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -61.68% | -16.74% | -44.94% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.68% | -22.77% | -38.91% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.68% | -37.73% | -23.95% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.50% | -0.16% | -29.34% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.60% | -6.40% | -23.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.65% | 3.10% | +3.55% |
Volatility
TGFRX vs. FAMVX - Volatility Comparison
Tanaka Growth Fund (TGFRX) has a higher volatility of 11.14% compared to FAM Value Fund (FAMVX) at 3.60%. This indicates that TGFRX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FAMVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGFRX | FAMVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.14% | 3.60% | +7.54% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.34% | 10.62% | +13.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.08% | 13.86% | +18.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 62.34% | 17.13% | +45.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 47.57% | 18.19% | +29.38% |
TGFRX vs. FAMVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGFRX has a 2.19% expense ratio, which is higher than FAMVX's 1.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
TGFRX vs. FAMVX - Dividend Comparison
TGFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.36%, more than FAMVX's 4.47% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FAMVX FAM Value Fund | 4.47% | 4.90% | 6.28% | 5.01% | 3.67% | 4.99% | 3.69% | 6.80% | 4.09% | 5.06% | 5.21% | 9.06% |
TGFRX Tanaka Growth Fund | 11.36% | 13.02% | 6.89% | 0.00% | 0.11% | 7.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TGFRX and FAMVX have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TGFRX has higher volatility (11.14%) compared to FAMVX (3.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGFRX dropped -74.43% vs FAMVX's -51.12%.
TGFRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGFRX and FAMVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer