TGDVX vs. LSVVX
TGDVX (TCW Relative Value Large Cap Fund) and LSVVX (LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, TGDVX returned 11.99%/yr vs 11.12%/yr for LSVVX. Their 0.95 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. TGDVX charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for LSVVX.
Performance
TGDVX vs. LSVVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TGDVX achieves a 12.91% return, which is significantly lower than LSVVX's 20.59% return. Over the past 10 years, TGDVX has outperformed LSVVX with an annualized return of 11.99%, while LSVVX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.12% annualized return.
TGDVX
- 1D
- 1.77%
- 1M
- 1.89%
- 6M
- 9.58%
- YTD
- 12.91%
- 1Y
- 27.71%
- 3Y*
- 18.25%
- 5Y*
- 13.09%
- 10Y*
- 11.99%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.98%
LSVVX
- 1D
- 0.18%
- 1M
- 3.40%
- 6M
- 16.55%
- YTD
- 20.59%
- 1Y
- 39.09%
- 3Y*
- 15.66%
- 5Y*
- 11.24%
- 10Y*
- 11.12%
- ALL TIME*
- 7.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
TGDVX vs. LSVVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TGDVX TCW Relative Value Large Cap Fund | 12.91% | 19.17% | 18.29% | 16.05% | -6.98% | 29.16% | 6.30% | 25.79% | -17.00% | 15.02% |
LSVVX LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund | 20.59% | 19.63% | 3.97% | 12.19% | -4.02% | 28.57% | -3.46% | 25.29% | -11.10% | 16.18% |
Correlation
The correlation between TGDVX and LSVVX is 0.85, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.85 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.87 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.91 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.93 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2007 | 0.95 |
The correlation between TGDVX and LSVVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.85 to 0.95 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TGDVX vs. LSVVX — Risk / Return Rank
TGDVX
LSVVX
TGDVX vs. LSVVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Relative Value Large Cap Fund (TGDVX) and LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund (LSVVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TGDVX | LSVVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.14 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.62 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.38 | 1.59 | -0.21 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.32 | 5.83 | -2.51 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.71 | 23.09 | -10.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TGDVX vs. LSVVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TGDVX drawdown since its inception was -60.90%, roughly equal to the maximum LSVVX drawdown of -61.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGDVX and LSVVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TGDVX | LSVVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -60.90% | -61.62% | +0.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.78% | -6.23% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -19.23% | -24.61% | +5.38% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.40% | -24.61% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.66% | -40.61% | -2.05% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.36% | -0.76% | +0.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.08% | -12.10% | +2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.03% | 1.58% | +0.45% |
Volatility
TGDVX vs. LSVVX - Volatility Comparison
TCW Relative Value Large Cap Fund (TGDVX) has a higher volatility of 2.83% compared to LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund (LSVVX) at 2.68%. This indicates that TGDVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LSVVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TGDVX | LSVVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.83% | 2.68% | +0.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.09% | 8.14% | +0.95% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 11.22% | +1.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.72% | 15.84% | +0.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.29% | 18.42% | +0.87% |
TGDVX vs. LSVVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
TGDVX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than LSVVX's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
TGDVX vs. LSVVX - Dividend Comparison
TGDVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.09%, more than LSVVX's 11.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LSVVX LSV Conservative Value Equity Fund | 11.35% | 13.69% | 2.45% | 6.57% | 5.41% | 3.67% | 2.40% | 21.48% | 3.91% | 1.98% | 2.37% | 2.38% |
TGDVX TCW Relative Value Large Cap Fund | 22.09% | 24.95% | 6.80% | 4.56% | 6.93% | 8.25% | 8.40% | 60.34% | 14.36% | 16.19% | 6.77% | 5.35% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TGDVX and LSVVX have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TGDVX has higher volatility (2.83%) compared to LSVVX (2.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGDVX dropped -60.90% vs LSVVX's -61.62%.
LSVVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.24 vs 2.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TGDVX and LSVVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer