PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TGCFX vs. STWTX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TGCFX vs. STWTX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in TCW Core Fixed Income Fund (TGCFX) and Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond Fund (STWTX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TGCFX achieves a 0.15% return, which is significantly lower than STWTX's 1.07% return. Over the past 10 years, TGCFX has underperformed STWTX with an annualized return of 1.60%, while STWTX has yielded a comparatively higher 1.82% annualized return.


TGCFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.36%
YTD
0.15%
6M
-0.00%
1Y
5.26%
3Y*
3.78%
5Y*
-0.21%
10Y*
1.60%

STWTX

1D
0.20%
1M
0.80%
YTD
1.07%
6M
1.33%
1Y
7.26%
3Y*
2.61%
5Y*
0.30%
10Y*
1.82%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TGCFX vs. STWTX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TGCFX
TCW Core Fixed Income Fund
0.15%7.51%0.75%5.61%-14.25%-1.27%8.79%8.75%0.09%3.23%
STWTX
Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond Fund
1.07%1.67%1.33%6.86%-8.46%0.01%6.01%7.59%0.34%4.13%

Correlation

The correlation between TGCFX and STWTX is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.70

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2011

0.63

The correlation between TGCFX and STWTX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.63 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TGCFX vs. STWTX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TGCFX
TGCFX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
TGCFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TGCFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
TGCFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
TGCFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
TGCFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

STWTX
STWTX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
STWTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
STWTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
STWTX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
STWTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
STWTX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TGCFX vs. STWTX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for TCW Core Fixed Income Fund (TGCFX) and Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond Fund (STWTX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TGCFXSTWTXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.24

2.15

-0.91

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.85

3.22

-1.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.48

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.64

2.12

-0.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.04

6.57

-1.53

TGCFX vs. STWTX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TGCFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.24, which is lower than the STWTX Sharpe Ratio of 2.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TGCFX and STWTX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TGCFXSTWTXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.24

2.15

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.03

0.06

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.31

0.47

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.34

0.75

-0.41

Drawdowns

TGCFX vs. STWTX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TGCFX drawdown since its inception was -19.37%, which is greater than STWTX's maximum drawdown of -14.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TGCFX and STWTX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TGCFXSTWTXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.37%

-14.44%

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.15%

-3.34%

+0.19%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.12%

-8.66%

+1.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.37%

-14.44%

-4.93%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.37%

-14.44%

-4.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.06%

-1.17%

-1.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.61%

-2.61%

-1.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

1.07%

-0.05%

Volatility

TGCFX vs. STWTX - Volatility Comparison

TCW Core Fixed Income Fund (TGCFX) has a higher volatility of 1.45% compared to Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond Fund (STWTX) at 1.21%. This indicates that TGCFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than STWTX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TGCFXSTWTXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.45%

1.21%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.94%

2.32%

+0.62%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.17%

3.31%

+0.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.55%

4.95%

+1.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.21%

3.93%

+1.28%

TGCFX vs. STWTX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TGCFX and STWTX have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Dividends

TGCFX vs. STWTX - Dividend Comparison

TGCFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.45%, more than STWTX's 3.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
STWTX
Hartford Schroders Tax-Aware Bond Fund
3.42%2.90%3.20%3.01%2.20%2.61%2.90%4.34%3.47%2.03%2.85%2.91%
TGCFX
TCW Core Fixed Income Fund
4.45%4.51%4.34%3.66%2.22%1.56%4.14%2.63%2.57%2.17%2.95%2.59%

Frequently Asked Questions


TGCFX and STWTX have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TGCFX has higher volatility (1.45%) compared to STWTX (1.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TGCFX dropped -19.37% vs STWTX's -14.44%.

STWTX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.15 vs 1.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TGCFX and STWTX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer