PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFSCX vs. FKGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFSCX vs. FKGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Templeton Institutional Foreign Smaller Companies Series Fund (TFSCX) and Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFSCX achieves a 10.51% return, which is significantly higher than FKGRX's 4.76% return. Over the past 10 years, TFSCX has underperformed FKGRX with an annualized return of 5.57%, while FKGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.26% annualized return.


TFSCX

1D
-1.14%
1M
-1.40%
YTD
10.51%
6M
10.62%
1Y
14.68%
3Y*
8.91%
5Y*
0.82%
10Y*
5.57%

FKGRX

1D
-1.02%
1M
-0.56%
YTD
4.76%
6M
3.77%
1Y
16.85%
3Y*
16.23%
5Y*
8.45%
10Y*
14.26%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFSCX vs. FKGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TFSCX
Templeton Institutional Foreign Smaller Companies Series Fund
10.51%10.61%-2.43%15.89%-23.28%10.58%8.95%22.86%-18.60%30.60%
FKGRX
Franklin Growth Fund
4.76%15.38%17.96%27.54%-25.32%21.61%30.71%32.08%-3.37%26.31%

Correlation

The correlation between TFSCX and FKGRX is 0.70, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.70

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.68

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2003

0.58

The correlation between TFSCX and FKGRX shifts across timeframes, from 0.58 (all time) to 0.71 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFSCX vs. FKGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFSCX
TFSCX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
TFSCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TFSCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
TFSCX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
TFSCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
TFSCX Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

FKGRX
FKGRX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FKGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FKGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
FKGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
FKGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
FKGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFSCX vs. FKGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Templeton Institutional Foreign Smaller Companies Series Fund (TFSCX) and Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


TFSCXFKGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.23

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.31

1.55

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.96

6.24

-2.29

TFSCX vs. FKGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFSCX Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is comparable to the FKGRX Sharpe Ratio of 1.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFSCX and FKGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

TFSCX vs. FKGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFSCX drawdown since its inception was -61.28%, which is greater than FKGRX's maximum drawdown of -51.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFSCX and FKGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFSCXFKGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-61.28%

-51.08%

-10.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.58%

-11.48%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.10%

-21.72%

+1.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-37.98%

-32.22%

-5.76%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.43%

-32.52%

-10.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.68%

-2.46%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-11.22%

-6.73%

-4.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.84%

2.85%

+0.99%

Volatility

TFSCX vs. FKGRX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Templeton Institutional Foreign Smaller Companies Series Fund (TFSCX) is 4.62%, while Franklin Growth Fund (FKGRX) has a volatility of 4.89%. This indicates that TFSCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFSCXFKGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.62%

4.89%

-0.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.15%

10.81%

+0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.62%

13.58%

+0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.74%

19.67%

-2.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.07%

19.58%

-3.51%

TFSCX vs. FKGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFSCX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than FKGRX's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

TFSCX vs. FKGRX - Dividend Comparison

TFSCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 64.95%, more than FKGRX's 13.72% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FKGRX
Franklin Growth Fund
13.72%14.37%8.34%6.26%10.49%9.19%7.97%5.75%1.65%2.38%3.26%3.88%
TFSCX
Templeton Institutional Foreign Smaller Companies Series Fund
64.95%71.78%14.37%1.28%2.34%16.40%1.23%3.06%14.00%3.83%1.83%1.43%

Frequently Asked Questions


TFSCX and FKGRX have a correlation of 0.70, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FKGRX has higher volatility (4.89%) compared to TFSCX (4.62%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFSCX dropped -61.28% vs FKGRX's -51.08%.

FKGRX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 1.12), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFSCX and FKGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer