PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TFNS vs. FBDC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TFNS vs. FBDC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS) and FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFNS achieves a -5.36% return, which is significantly higher than FBDC's -9.51% return.


TFNS

1D
-1.39%
1M
-1.27%
YTD
-5.36%
6M
-2.12%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FBDC

1D
-2.98%
1M
-7.81%
YTD
-9.51%
6M
-10.31%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFNS vs. FBDC - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between TFNS and FBDC is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 1, 2025

0.51

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TFNS vs. FBDC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS) and FT Confluence BDC & Specialty Finance Income ETF (FBDC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

TFNS vs. FBDC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TFNSFBDCDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

-0.70

+1.01

Drawdowns

TFNS vs. FBDC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFNS drawdown since its inception was -14.00%, smaller than the maximum FBDC drawdown of -20.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFNS and FBDC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TFNSFBDCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.00%

-20.60%

+6.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.00%

-17.24%

+9.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.82%

-10.14%

+6.32%

Volatility

TFNS vs. FBDC - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TFNSFBDCDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.04%

18.06%

-3.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.04%

18.06%

-3.02%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.04%

18.06%

-3.02%

TFNS vs. FBDC - Expense Ratio Comparison

TFNS has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than FBDC's 1.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

TFNS vs. FBDC - Dividend Comparison

TFNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.52%, less than FBDC's 11.52% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


TFNS and FBDC have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, TFNS is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

TFNS is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 1.35% for FBDC.

FBDC has the higher dividend yield at 11.52%, compared with 0.52% for TFNS.

They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TFNS and 1.35% for FBDC.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TFNS and FBDC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer