TFNS vs. DFNL
TFNS (T. Rowe Price Financials ETF) and DFNL (Davis Select Financial ETF) are both Financials Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TFNS returned 9.47% vs 17.74% for DFNL. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TFNS charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for DFNL.
Performance
TFNS vs. DFNL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TFNS achieves a -0.33% return, which is significantly lower than DFNL's 1.39% return.
TFNS
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 3.27%
- YTD
- -0.33%
- 6M
- -2.16%
- 1Y
- 9.47%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DFNL
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 5.06%
- YTD
- 1.39%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 17.74%
- 3Y*
- 25.44%
- 5Y*
- 12.51%
- 10Y*
- —
TFNS vs. DFNL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
TFNS T. Rowe Price Financials ETF | -0.33% | 11.06% |
DFNL Davis Select Financial ETF | 1.39% | 18.79% |
Correlation
The correlation between TFNS and DFNL is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 12, 2025 | 0.88 |
The correlation between TFNS and DFNL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.88 - a consistent structural relationship.
TFNS vs. DFNL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
TFNS
DFNL
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
TFNS
DFNL
Technology
TFNS
DFNL
Industrials
TFNS
DFNL
Basic Materials
TFNS
-
DFNL
-
Communication Services
TFNS
-
DFNL
-
Consumer Cyclical
TFNS
-
DFNL
Consumer Defensive
TFNS
-
DFNL
-
Energy
TFNS
-
DFNL
-
Healthcare
TFNS
-
DFNL
-
Real Estate
TFNS
-
DFNL
-
Utilities
TFNS
-
DFNL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TFNS vs. DFNL — Risk / Return Rank
TFNS
DFNL
TFNS vs. DFNL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS) and Davis Select Financial ETF (DFNL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TFNS | DFNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.79 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.21 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.68 | 1.38 | -0.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.83 | 3.89 | -2.06 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TFNS vs. DFNL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TFNS drawdown since its inception was -14.00%, smaller than the maximum DFNL drawdown of -44.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFNS and DFNL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TFNS | DFNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.00% | -44.51% | +30.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.00% | -12.94% | -1.06% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.05% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.27% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.11% | -1.55% | -1.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.81% | -7.64% | +3.83% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.20% | 4.57% | +0.63% |
Volatility
TFNS vs. DFNL - Volatility Comparison
T. Rowe Price Financials ETF (TFNS) and Davis Select Financial ETF (DFNL) have volatilities of 4.10% and 4.10%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TFNS | DFNL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.10% | 4.10% | 0.00% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.38% | 11.33% | +0.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.90% | 14.65% | +0.25% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 19.25% | -4.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.01% | 22.57% | -7.56% |
TFNS vs. DFNL - Expense Ratio Comparison
TFNS has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than DFNL's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
TFNS vs. DFNL - Dividend Comparison
TFNS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.49%, less than DFNL's 1.35% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFNL Davis Select Financial ETF | 1.35% | 1.37% | 2.19% | 2.33% | 3.34% | 2.45% | 1.45% | 2.52% | 3.12% | 1.10% |
TFNS T. Rowe Price Financials ETF | 0.49% | 0.49% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TFNS and DFNL have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
DFNL has higher volatility (4.10%) compared to TFNS (4.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFNS dropped -14.00% vs DFNL's -44.51%.
On 1-year performance, DFNL leads with 17.74% vs 9.47% for TFNS. On fees, TFNS is cheaper at 0.44% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, DFNL has performed better with a 17.74% return vs 9.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TFNS is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.64% for DFNL.
DFNL has the higher dividend yield at 1.35%, compared with 0.49% for TFNS.
They also come from different issuers: T. Rowe Price and Davis Advisers. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for TFNS and 0.64% for DFNL.
DFNL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TFNS and DFNL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer