TFJL vs. ZMAR

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

TFJL (Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly) and ZMAR (Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March) are both Defined Outcome funds from Innovator. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, TFJL returned -2.72% vs 7.62% for ZMAR. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 0.79% expense ratio.

Performance

TFJL vs. ZMAR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly (TFJL) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TFJL achieves a -2.35% return, which is significantly lower than ZMAR's 2.66% return.

TFJL

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: -0.05%
• YTD: -2.35%
• 6M: -4.14%
• 1Y: -2.72%
• 3Y*: -1.72%
• 5Y*: -3.76%
• 10Y*: —

ZMAR

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.76%
• YTD: 2.66%
• 6M: 3.27%
• 1Y: 7.62%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TFJL vs. ZMAR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
TFJL Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly	-2.35%	-6.03%
ZMAR Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March	2.66%	5.95%

Correlation

The correlation between TFJL and ZMAR is 0.16, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.16
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 4, 2025	0.11

Return for Risk

TFJL vs. ZMAR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TFJL

TFJL Risk / Return Rank: 6
TFJL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6
TFJL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
TFJL Omega Ratio Rank: 5
TFJL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6
TFJL Martin Ratio Rank: 6

ZMAR

ZMAR Risk / Return Rank: 94
ZMAR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 94
ZMAR Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
ZMAR Omega Ratio Rank: 96
ZMAR Calmar Ratio Rank: 89
ZMAR Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TFJL vs. ZMAR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly (TFJL) and Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	TFJL	ZMAR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.33	3.61	-3.95
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.42	5.89	-6.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.95	1.84	-0.88
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	5.32	-5.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.73	30.39	-31.12
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

TFJL vs. ZMAR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TFJL Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is lower than the ZMAR Sharpe Ratio of 3.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TFJL and ZMAR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	TFJL	ZMAR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.33	3.61	-3.95
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.40	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.48	2.29	-2.77

Drawdowns

TFJL vs. ZMAR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TFJL drawdown since its inception was -25.45%, which is greater than ZMAR's maximum drawdown of -2.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TFJL and ZMAR.

Drawdown Indicators

	TFJL	ZMAR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-25.45%	-2.30%	-23.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.50%	-1.44%	-7.06%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.45%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-22.83%	-0.05%	-22.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-15.02%	-0.23%	-14.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.74%	0.25%	+3.49%

Volatility

TFJL vs. ZMAR - Volatility Comparison

Innovator 20+ Year Treasury Bond 5 Floor ETF - Quarterly (TFJL) has a higher volatility of 1.99% compared to Innovator Equity Defined Protection ETF - 1 Yr March (ZMAR) at 0.37%. This indicates that TFJL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ZMAR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TFJL	ZMAR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.99%	0.37%	+1.62%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.67%	1.57%	+4.10%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	8.22%	2.12%	+6.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	9.34%	3.05%	+6.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	9.03%	3.05%	+5.98%

TFJL vs. ZMAR - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TFJL and ZMAR have an expense ratio of 0.79%.

Dividends

TFJL vs. ZMAR - Dividend Comparison

Neither TFJL nor ZMAR has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TFJL and ZMAR in my portfolio?

TFJL and ZMAR have a correlation of 0.16, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TFJL or ZMAR?

TFJL has higher volatility (1.99%) compared to ZMAR (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TFJL dropped -25.45% vs ZMAR's -2.30%.

Which ETF is better, TFJL or ZMAR?

On 1-year performance, ZMAR leads with 7.62% vs -2.72% for TFJL. Both ETFs have the same 0.79% expense ratio. On volatility, ZMAR has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TFJL or ZMAR?

Over the 1-year period, ZMAR has performed better with a 7.62% return vs -2.72%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TFJL or ZMAR?

TFJL and ZMAR have the same expense ratio: 0.79% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TFJL or ZMAR?

TFJL and ZMAR have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ZMAR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.61 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.